Skip Github Action if there is no branch specified #134
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vatanaksoytezer
changed the title
|
Hey! Thanks for opening the PR. Sorry for not having the time to review it until now. |
|
i think this was accidentally automatically closed due to activity in another (private) repository. would be awesome if we could re-open and get reviewed/merged! |
|
Merging this would be ideal to fix that issue, because it super annoying to have failed actions when the PR don't need to be backported @sorenlouv. Thanks for the fix @e3l 👏 |
|
Hey @sorenlouv sorry I was away for a while. Re opened the issue. Please feel free to merge or request any changes and will do asap. Thank you! |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey, thank you so much for this tool! #127 was getting a bit annoying for us. So this should address #127 by skipping the action (and issue a warning) if it is just a no-branch issue. Please let me know if you want it to be implemented any other way. Thank you!