Add vmin and vmax lines to histogram

[javerbukh]

Description

This pull request is to address point 4 of this comment #2097 (comment)

Before

After
EDIT: Removed original image, here is the latest:

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Add vmin and vmax lines to plot options histogram. [2301]

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.03% 🎉

Comparison is base (0f3f4f6) 90.95% compared to head (0692da9) 90.99%.

❗ Current head 0692da9 differs from pull request most recent head 3d70288. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3d70288 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2301      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.95%   90.99%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         152      152              
  Lines       17198    17274      +76     
==========================================
+ Hits        15642    15718      +76     
  Misses       1556     1556              

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...nfigs/default/plugins/plot_options/plot_options.py	95.08% <100.00%> (+0.41%)	⬆️
...lt/plugins/plot_options/tests/test_plot_options.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
jdaviz/core/marks.py	90.76% <100.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[kecnry]

can we just modify the position of the existing marks instead of destroying and creating new ones?

[kecnry]

We decided to defer optimizing updating the mark until the effort to use the plot subcomponent (#2254).

[duytnguyendtn]

I was promised a 30 line code review, this is over double what I was promised! 😉

I find the histogram marks to be quite responsive and the code straightforward to read. Thanks!

[kecnry]

(Probably worth a squash & merge once the change log is added)