Skip to content

Polish documentation #42445

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Polish documentation #42445

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ngocnhan-tran1996
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Sep 25, 2024
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ spring:
[[data.sql.jdbc-template]]
== Using JdbcTemplate

Spring's `JdbcTemplate` and `NamedParameterJdbcTemplate` classes are auto-configured, and you can `@Autowire` them directly into your own beans, as shown in the following example:
Copy link
Contributor

@mhalbritter mhalbritter Sep 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is intentional. While the annotation is called @Autowired, we made a verb out of it, @Autowire.

Team: I think that's somewhat confusing. Maybe it's besser to change this to "and you can autowire them ..." ?

Copy link
Member

@wilkinsona wilkinsona Sep 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for changing to "autowire". The Framework docs use "autowire" as a verb and we should follow suit, particularly as the example that follows doesn't even use @Autowired as it does not need to do so.

@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ If you want to make sure that each context has a separate embedded database, you
[[data.sql.r2dbc.using-database-client]]
=== Using DatabaseClient

A `DatabaseClient` bean is auto-configured, and you can `@Autowire` it directly into your own beans, as shown in the following example:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 here too.

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ If you need to start a full running server, we recommend that you use random por
If you use `@SpringBootTest(webEnvironment=WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)`, an available port is picked at random each time your test runs.

The `@LocalServerPort` annotation can be used to xref:how-to:webserver.adoc#howto.webserver.discover-port[inject the actual port used] into your test.
For convenience, tests that need to make REST calls to the started server can additionally `@Autowire` a {url-spring-framework-docs}/testing/webtestclient.html[`WebTestClient`], which resolves relative links to the running server and comes with a dedicated API for verifying responses, as shown in the following example:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The example needs @Autowired (so that the test context framework's parameter resolver kicks in) but I'm still in favor of using "autowire" here as well.

@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: documentation A documentation update for: team-attention An issue we'd like other members of the team to review for: merge-with-amendments Needs some changes when we merge and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Sep 25, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added this to the 3.2.x milestone Sep 25, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter changed the title Update document Polish documentation Sep 26, 2024
mhalbritter pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
@mhalbritter
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @ngocnhan-tran1996 !

@mhalbritter mhalbritter modified the milestones: 3.2.x, 3.2.11 Sep 26, 2024
@mhalbritter mhalbritter removed for: team-attention An issue we'd like other members of the team to review for: merge-with-amendments Needs some changes when we merge labels Sep 26, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants