Skip to content

Tiny improvement of examples. #3269

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

schauder
Copy link
Contributor

Examples for limiting queries with and without a property argument are now better mixed.
This makes it more clear that limiting and filtering by property are orthogonal concerns.

Closes #3268

Examples for limiting queries with and without a property argument are now better mixed.
This makes it more clear that limiting and filtering by property are orthogonal concerns.

Closes #3268
@schauder schauder force-pushed the issue/tiny-sample-improvement branch from 1631025 to 64e09af Compare April 15, 2025 08:13
@schauder schauder requested a review from mp911de April 15, 2025 08:15
schauder added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Examples for limiting queries with and without a property argument are now better mixed.
This makes it more clear that limiting and filtering by property are orthogonal concerns.

Closes #3268
Original pull request #3269
@schauder schauder self-assigned this Apr 16, 2025
schauder added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Examples for limiting queries with and without a property argument are now better mixed.
This makes it more clear that limiting and filtering by property are orthogonal concerns.

Closes #3268
Original pull request #3269
schauder added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Examples for limiting queries with and without a property argument are now better mixed.
This makes it more clear that limiting and filtering by property are orthogonal concerns.

Closes #3268
Original pull request #3269
@schauder
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged and back ported.

@schauder schauder closed this Apr 16, 2025
onobc pushed a commit to onobc/spring-data-commons that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Original pull request: spring-projects#3269

Signed-off-by: KIMSIWOO <sa20207@naver.com>
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation enhancement: Separate examples of methods with special parameters and methods without
2 participants