Skip to content

Reference documentation mentions HashOperations to be autowired #2828

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
imba-tjd opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Reference documentation mentions HashOperations to be autowired #2828

imba-tjd opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update

Comments

@imba-tjd
Copy link
Contributor

https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/redis/reference/redis/hash-mappers.html

  @Autowired
  HashOperations<String, byte[], byte[]> hashOperations;

this won't work. There are some discussion about it.

it turns out this works.

@Resource(name = "redisTemplate")
HashOperations<String, byte[], byte[]> hashOperations;

In the mean time, @Autowired @Qualifier("redisTemplate") fails. I don't konw why.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jan 11, 2024
@mp911de mp911de changed the title docs: HashOperations fails to be autowired Reference documentation mentions HashOperations to be autowired Jan 11, 2024
@mp911de mp911de added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jan 11, 2024
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.2.2 (2023.1.2) milestone Jan 11, 2024
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2024
Add missing property editors to inject requested operations.

See #2828
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 11, 2024
Add missing property editors to inject requested operations.

See #2828
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants