Skip to content

Add Stream support to JdbcAggregateOperations #1714

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
forlor opened this issue Jan 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Add Stream support to JdbcAggregateOperations #1714

forlor opened this issue Jan 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement

Comments

@forlor
Copy link

forlor commented Jan 6, 2024

for example:
Stream findAll(Query query, Class domainType);

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jan 6, 2024
@mp911de mp911de changed the title Can JdbcAggregateOperations support stream queries? Add Stream support to JdbcAggregateOperations Jan 8, 2024
@mp911de mp911de added type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jan 8, 2024
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Jan 8, 2024

JdbcAggregateOperations does not yet support queries returning Stream. However, you can use repository query methods to return a Stream.

@schauder schauder linked a pull request Jan 16, 2025 that will close this issue
schauder pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
See #1714
Original pull request #1963

Signed-off-by: Sergey Korotaev <sergey.evgen.kor2501@gmail.com>
schauder added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
Minor formatting and references to GH issues.

See #1714
Original pull request #1963
@schauder
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by ea29642

@schauder schauder added this to the 3.5 M1 (2025.0.0) milestone Jan 16, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants