Skip to content

improve Go To Definition to bean definitions in @ConditionalOnBean and @ConditionalOnMissingBean #1381

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
martinlippert opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

improve Go To Definition to bean definitions in @ConditionalOnBean and @ConditionalOnMissingBean #1381

martinlippert opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@martinlippert
Labels
for: vscode something that is specific for VSCode type: enhancement
Milestone
4.26.0.RELEASE

Comments

@martinlippert
Copy link
Member

Various smaller improvements to implement:

  • include @ConditionalOnMissingBean in ConditionalOnBeanDefinitionProvider
  • focus on attributes with name name (do not try to find beans for other attributes, like type)
  • support bean names defined in arrays
@martinlippert martinlippert added type: enhancement for: vscode something that is specific for VSCode labels Oct 10, 2024
@martinlippert martinlippert added this to the 4.26.0.RELEASE milestone Oct 10, 2024
@martinlippert martinlippert self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
martinlippert added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 10, 2024
@martinlippert
GH-1381: support Go To Definition for ConditionalOnMissingBean, focus…
54d7ee4 
… in name attribute, and support value arrays
@martinlippert
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed with 54d7ee4

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees

@martinlippert martinlippert

Labels
for: vscode something that is specific for VSCode type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.26.0.RELEASE
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@martinlippert