-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Publish container file on docker/ghcr.io #34
Comments
Hey @7677865466 Thanks for bringing that up. Actually I thought about it but if I publish an image, it will be only with "free" engines without API keys (just like the KASM version). Do you have limitations or a specific environment where you need a Docker image instead of using Docker Compose? It's all about config (secrets.json). I am open to discussion about this :) |
The main reason for me is that it is easier to deploy and update the image to a newer version whenever a new version of Cyberbro is released. You can also consider using environment variables to make deployment even more easier as there is no config file needed. By doing so, you can add all the third-party secrets to the compose file. I am using podman quadlet (opposed to docker-compose) and they have a built-in updater that checks and updates the image if a new container image has been published. |
That makes sense! I will think about it :) |
Hello @7677865466 I'm planning to release the docker image soon (probably today) Advanced options for deploymentAll variables from
|
Advanced config - Ability to avoid secrets.json if ENV variables are provided - useful for Container deployment #34
@7677865466 you will be able to use the image Example of
|
Have recently stumbled upon Cyberbro and am enjoying it so far. I saw you have published a Kasm container image but there doesn't seem to be a container image for the vanilla application. Are you also able to publish this through docker or the Github container registry?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: