Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Update LTS status #456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2018
Merged

Update LTS status #456

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2018

Conversation

bajtos
Copy link
Member

@bajtos bajtos commented Oct 12, 2018

strong-remoting@3.x is Active LTS now, strong-remoting@2.x moved to Maintenance LTS.

See loopbackio/loopback-next#1802

@hacksparrow
Copy link
Member

👍

@dhmlau
Copy link
Member

dhmlau commented Oct 12, 2018

@bajtos, just a question. I'm not familiar with what strong-remoting does, so I'm wondering how can someone upgrade to LoopBack 4. Perhaps that might be something that can be included in the REAMDE?

@bajtos
Copy link
Member Author

bajtos commented Oct 15, 2018

@bajtos, just a question. I'm not familiar with what strong-remoting does, so I'm wondering how can someone upgrade to LoopBack 4. Perhaps that might be something that can be included in the README?

Good point!

strong-remoting is sort of an equivalent of @loopback/rest. It implements a transport layer exposing LB3 Model classes via a network transport like REST, JSON RPC or Socket.io (websockets).

Upgrading an LB3 app to an LB4 app is something we need to figure out yet - see loopbackio/loopback-next#1849

Migrating an application built directly on top of strong-remoting (without loopback) to LB4 would be a lot of work because pretty much everything is different in LB4. To be honest, I don't think there are many (if any) users depending on strong-remoting directly. I feel that writing a migration guide for strong-remoting users would be likely a waste of our precious time now. Let's wait until there is strong user demand for that.

At the same time, I see how the messaging proposed in my pull request can be confusing to readers. Let me expand it a bit to make the options more clear.

@bajtos
Copy link
Member Author

bajtos commented Oct 15, 2018

@dhmlau LGTY now?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants