Skip to content

[lldb][NFC] Actually test which method we call in TestCallOverriddenMethod #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2019

Conversation

Teemperor
Copy link

llvm-svn: 373051

This commit is needed to let the test added for the artificial constructor fix pass.

@Teemperor
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

1 similar comment
@hyp
Copy link

hyp commented Oct 19, 2019

@swift-ci test

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere merged commit f23faf8 into swiftlang:swift/master Oct 25, 2019
adrian-prantl pushed a commit to adrian-prantl/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
This fixes a failing testcase on Fedora 30 x86_64 (regression Fedora 29->30):

PASS:
./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit
  * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`__GI_raise + 325
    frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`__GI_abort + 295
    frame swiftlang#2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2
    frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2
    frame swiftlang#4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2
    frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2
    frame swiftlang#6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243
    frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`_start + 46

vs.

FAIL - unrecognized abort() function:
./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit
  * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`.annobin_raise.c + 325
    frame swiftlang#1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`.annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely + 295
    frame swiftlang#2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2
    frame swiftlang#3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2
    frame swiftlang#4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2
    frame swiftlang#5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2
    frame swiftlang#6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`.annobin_libc_start.c + 243
    frame swiftlang#7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`.annobin_init.c.hot + 46

The extra ELF symbols are there due to Annobin (I did not investigate why this problem happened specifically since F-30 and not since F-28).
It is due to:

Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2361 entries:
Valu e          Size Type   Bind   Vis     Name
0000000000022769   5 FUNC   LOCAL  DEFAULT _nl_load_domain.cold
000000000002276e   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_abort.c.unlikely
...
000000000002276e   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely
...
000000000002276e   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_textdomain.c_end.unlikely
000000000002276e 548 FUNC   GLOBAL DEFAULT abort
000000000002276e 548 FUNC   GLOBAL DEFAULT abort@@GLIBC_2.2.5
000000000002276e 548 FUNC   LOCAL  DEFAULT __GI_abort
0000000000022992   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_abort.c_end.unlikely

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540

llvm-svn: 364773
(cherry picked from commit 3f594ed)
adrian-prantl pushed a commit to adrian-prantl/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
If a core file has an EFI version string which includes a UUID
(similar to what it returns for the kdp KDP_KERNELVERSION packet)
in the LC_IDENT or LC_NOTE 'kern ver str' load command.  In that
case, we should try to find the binary and dSYM for the UUID
listed.  The dSYM may have python code which knows how to relocate
the binary to the correct address in lldb's target section load
list and loads other ancillary binaries.

The test case is a little involved,

1. it compiles an inferior hello world apple (a.out),
2. it compiles a program which can create a corefile manually
   with a specific binary's UUID encoded in it,
3. it gets the UUID of the a.out binary,
4. it creates a shell script, dsym-for-uuid.sh, which will
   return the full path to the a.out + a.out.dSYM when called
   with teh correct UUID,
5. it sets the LLDB_APPLE_DSYMFORUUID_EXECUTABLE env var before
   creating the lldb target, to point to this dsym-for-uuid.sh,
6. runs the create-corefile binary we compiled in step swiftlang#2,
7. loads the corefile from step swiftlang#6 into lldb,
8. verifies that lldb loaded a.out by reading the LC_NOTE
   load command from the corefile, calling dsym-for-uuid.sh with
   that UUID, got back the path to a.out and loaded it.

whew!

<rdar://problem/47562911>

llvm-svn: 366378
(cherry picked from commit be4be61)
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2019
Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the
target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values
(DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent).

Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU
tail calls.

Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call:

```
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
    frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
```

Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible):

```
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
    frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial]
    frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
```

rdar://46577651

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2019
…_call is understood"

This caused Chromium builds to fail with "inlinable function call in a function
with debug info must have a !dbg location" errors. See
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1022296#c1 for a
reproducer.

> Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the
> target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values
> (DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent).
>
> Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU
> tail calls.
>
> Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call:
>
> ```
>   * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
>     frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
> ```
>
> Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible):
>
> ```
>   * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
>     frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial]
>     frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
> ```
>
> rdar://46577651
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
During register coalescing, we update the live-intervals on-the-fly.
To do that we are in this strange mode where the live-intervals can
be slightly out-of-sync (more precisely they are forward looking)
compared to what the IR actually represents.
This happens because the register coalescer only updates the IR when
it is done with updating the live-intervals and it has to do it this
way because updating the IR on-the-fly would actually clobber some
information on how the live-ranges that are being updated look like.

This is problematic for updates that rely on the IR to accurately
represents the state of the live-ranges. Right now, we have only
one of those: stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
To reconcile this need of out-of-sync IR, this patch introduces a
new argument to LiveInterval::refineSubRanges that allows the code
doing the live range updates to reason about how the code should
look like after the coalescer will have rewritten the registers.
Essentially this captures how a subregister index with be offseted
to match its position in a new register class.

E.g., let say we want to merge:
    V1.sub1:<2 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>

We do that by choosing a class where sub1:<2 x s32> and sub3:<4 x s32>
overlap, i.e., by choosing a class where we can find "offset + 1 == 3".
Put differently we align V2's sub3 with V1's sub1:
    V2: sub0 sub1 sub2 sub3
    V1: <offset>  sub0 sub1

This offset will look like a composed subregidx in the the class:
     V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
 =>  V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>

Now if we didn't rewrite the uses and def of V1, all the checks for V1
need to account for this offset to match what the live intervals intend
to capture.

Prior to this patch, we would fail to recognize the uses and def of V1
and would end up with machine verifier errors: No live segment at def.
This could lead to miscompile as we would drop some live-ranges and
thus, miss some interferences.

For this problem to trigger, we need to reach stripValuesNotDefiningMask
while having a mismatch between the IR and the live-ranges (i.e.,
we have to apply a subreg offset to the IR.)

This requires the following three conditions:
1. An update of overlapping subreg lanes: e.g., dsub0 == <ssub0, ssub1>
2. An update with Tuple registers with a possibility to coalesce the
   subreg index: e.g., v1.dsub_1 == v2.dsub_3
3. Subreg liveness enabled.

looking at the IR to decide what is alive and what is not, i.e., calling
stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
coalescer maintains for the live-ranges information.

None of the targets that currently use subreg liveness (i.e., the targets
that fulfill #3, Hexagon, AMDGPU, PowerPC, and SystemZ IIRC) expose #1 and
and #2, so this patch also artificial enables subreg liveness for ARM,
so that a nice test case can be attached.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2019
…ood (reland with fixes)

Currently, clang emits subprograms for declared functions when the
target debugger or DWARF standard is known to support entry values
(DW_OP_entry_value & the GNU equivalent).

Treat DW_AT_tail_call the same way to allow debuggers to follow cross-TU
tail calls.

Pre-patch debug session with a cross-TU tail call:

```
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
    frame #1: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
```

Post-patch (note that the tail-calling frame, "helper", is visible):

```
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100000fa4 main`target at b.c:4:3 [opt]
    frame #1: 0x0000000100000f80 main`helper [opt] [artificial]
    frame #2: 0x0000000100000f99 main`main at a.c:8:10 [opt]
```

This was reverted in 5b9a072 because it attached declaration
subprograms to inlinable builtin calls, which interacted badly with the
MergeICmps pass. The fix is to not attach declarations to builtins.

rdar://46577651

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69743
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2019
…outlined functions"

This reverts commit cec2d5c.

Reverting because this is still creating outlined functions with return
address signing instructions with mismatches SP values. For example:

  int *volatile v;

  void foo(int x) {
    int a[x];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
  }

  void bar(int x) {
    int a[x];
    v = 0;
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
    v = &a[0];
  }

This generates these two outlined functions, both of which modify SP
between the paciasp and retaa instructions:

  $ clang --target=aarch64-arm-none-eabi -march=armv8.3-a -c test2.c -o - -S -Oz -mbranch-protection=pac-ret+leaf
  ...
  OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0:                    // @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0
          .cfi_sections .debug_frame
          .cfi_startproc
  // %bb.0:
          paciasp
          .cfi_negate_ra_state
          mov     w8, w0
          lsl     x8, x8, #2
          add     x8, x8, #15             // =15
          mov     x9, sp
          and     x8, x8, #0x7fffffff0
          sub     x8, x9, x8
          mov     x29, sp
          mov     sp, x8
          adrp    x9, v
          retaa
  ...
  OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1:                    // @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1
          .cfi_startproc
  // %bb.0:
          paciasp
          .cfi_negate_ra_state
          str     x8, [x9, :lo12:v]
          str     x8, [x9, :lo12:v]
          str     x8, [x9, :lo12:v]
          str     x8, [x9, :lo12:v]
          str     x8, [x9, :lo12:v]
          mov     sp, x29
          retaa
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
…F optimizing part. #2.

Summary:
This patch relands D71271. The problem with D71271 is that it has cyclic dependency:
CodeGen->AsmPrinter->DebugInfoDWARF->CodeGen. To avoid cyclic dependency this patch
puts implementation for DWARFOptimizer into separate library: lib/DWARFLinker.

Thus the difference between this patch and D71271 is in that DWARFOptimizer renamed into
DWARFLinker and it`s files are put into lib/DWARFLinker.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, friss, dblaikie, aprantl

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: thegameg, merge_guards_bot, probinson, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm, #debug-info

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71839
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2020
…t binding

This fixes a failing testcase on Fedora 30 x86_64 (regression Fedora 29->30):

PASS:
./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit
  * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`__GI_raise + 325
    frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`__GI_abort + 295
    frame #2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2
    frame #3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2
    frame #4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2
    frame #5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2
    frame #6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 243
    frame #7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`_start + 46

vs.

FAIL - unrecognized abort() function:
./bin/lldb ./lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/unwind/noreturn/TestNoreturnUnwind.test_dwarf/a.out -o 'settings set symbols.enable-external-lookup false' -o r -o bt -o quit
  * frame #0: 0x00007ffff7aa6e75 libc.so.6`.annobin_raise.c + 325
    frame #1: 0x00007ffff7a91895 libc.so.6`.annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely + 295
    frame #2: 0x0000000000401140 a.out`func_c at main.c:12:2
    frame #3: 0x000000000040113a a.out`func_b at main.c:18:2
    frame #4: 0x0000000000401134 a.out`func_a at main.c:26:2
    frame #5: 0x000000000040112e a.out`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) at main.c:32:2
    frame #6: 0x00007ffff7a92f33 libc.so.6`.annobin_libc_start.c + 243
    frame #7: 0x000000000040106e a.out`.annobin_init.c.hot + 46

The extra ELF symbols are there due to Annobin (I did not investigate why this
problem happened specifically since F-30 and not since F-28).

It is due to:

Symbol table '.dynsym' contains 2361 entries:
Valu e          Size Type   Bind   Vis     Name
0000000000022769   5 FUNC   LOCAL  DEFAULT _nl_load_domain.cold
000000000002276e   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_abort.c.unlikely
...
000000000002276e   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_loadmsgcat.c_end.unlikely
...
000000000002276e   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_textdomain.c_end.unlikely
000000000002276e 548 FUNC   GLOBAL DEFAULT abort
000000000002276e 548 FUNC   GLOBAL DEFAULT abort@@GLIBC_2.2.5
000000000002276e 548 FUNC   LOCAL  DEFAULT __GI_abort
0000000000022992   0 NOTYPE LOCAL  HIDDEN  .annobin_abort.c_end.unlikely

GDB has some more complicated preferences between overlapping and/or sharing
address symbols, I have made here so far the most simple fix for this case.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2020
The test is currently failing on some systems with ASAN enabled due to:
```
==22898==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x603000003da4 at pc 0x00010951c33d bp 0x7ffee6709e00 sp 0x7ffee67095c0
READ of size 5 at 0x603000003da4 thread T0
    #0 0x10951c33c in wrap_memmove+0x16c (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x1833c)
    #1 0x7fff4a327f57 in CFDataReplaceBytes+0x1ba (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x13f57)
    #2 0x7fff4a415a44 in __CFDataInit+0x2db (CoreFoundation:x86_64+0x101a44)
    #3 0x1094f8490 in main main.m:424
    #4 0x7fff77482084 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x17084)
0x603000003da4 is located 0 bytes to the right of 20-byte region [0x603000003d90,0x603000003da4)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x109547c02 in wrap_calloc+0xa2 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x43c02)
    #1 0x7fff763ad3ef in class_createInstance+0x52 (libobjc.A.dylib:x86_64+0x73ef)
    #2 0x7fff4c6b2d73 in NSAllocateObject+0x12 (Foundation:x86_64+0x1d73)
    #3 0x7fff4c6b5e5f in -[_NSPlaceholderData initWithBytes:length:copy:deallocator:]+0x40 (Foundation:x86_64+0x4e5f)
    #4 0x7fff4c6d4cf1 in -[NSData(NSData) initWithBytes:length:]+0x24 (Foundation:x86_64+0x23cf1)
    #5 0x1094f8245 in main main.m:404
    #6 0x7fff77482084 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x17084)
```

The reason is that we create a string "HELLO" but get the size wrong (it's 5 bytes instead
of 4). Later on we read the buffer and pretend it is 5 bytes long, causing an OOB read
which ASAN detects.

In general this test probably needs some cleanup as it produces on macOS 10.15 around
100 compiler warnings which isn't great, but let's first get the bot green.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
This reverts commit e57a9ab.

Parser/cxx2a-placeholder-type-constraint.cpp has MSan failures.

Present at 7b81c3f:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17133/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio
not present at eaa594f:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/builds/17132/steps/check-clang%20msan/logs/stdio

Stack trace:
```
==57032==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0 0xccfe016 in clang::AutoTypeLoc::getLocalSourceRange() const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h:2036:19
    #1 0xcc56758 in CheckDeducedPlaceholderConstraints(clang::Sema&, clang::AutoType const&, clang::AutoTypeLoc, clang::QualType) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4505:56
    #2 0xcc550ce in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeLoc, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4707:11
    #3 0xcc52407 in clang::Sema::DeduceAutoType(clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::Expr*&, clang::QualType&, llvm::Optional<unsigned int>, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:4457:10
    #4 0xba38332 in clang::Sema::deduceVarTypeFromInitializer(clang::VarDecl*, clang::DeclarationName, clang::QualType, clang::TypeSourceInfo*, clang::SourceRange, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11351:7
    #5 0xba3a8a9 in clang::Sema::DeduceVariableDeclarationType(clang::VarDecl*, bool, clang::Expr*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11385:26
    #6 0xba3c520 in clang::Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(clang::Decl*, clang::Expr*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:11725:9
    #7 0xb39c498 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationAfterDeclaratorAndAttributes(clang::Declarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2399:17
    #8 0xb394d80 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2128:21
    #9 0xb383bbf in clang::Parser::ParseSimpleDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, bool, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:1848:10
    #10 0xb383129 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclaration(clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation&, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/PointerUnion.h
    #11 0xb53a388 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttributes(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:221:13
    #12 0xb539309 in clang::Parser::ParseStatementOrDeclaration(llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 32u>&, clang::Parser::ParsedStmtContext, clang::SourceLocation*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:106:20
    #13 0xb55610e in clang::Parser::ParseCompoundStatementBody(bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:1079:11
    #14 0xb559529 in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionStatementBody(clang::Decl*, clang::Parser::ParseScope&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp:2204:21
    #15 0xb33c13e in clang::Parser::ParseFunctionDefinition(clang::ParsingDeclarator&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::Parser::LateParsedAttrList*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1339:10
    #16 0xb394703 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclGroup(clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::DeclaratorContext, clang::SourceLocation*, clang::Parser::ForRangeInit*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2068:11
    #17 0xb338e52 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1099:10
    #18 0xb337674 in clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1115:12
    #19 0xb334a96 in clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:935:12
    #20 0xb32f12a in clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:686:12
    #21 0xb31e193 in clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Parse/ParseAST.cpp:158:20
    #22 0x80263f0 in clang::FrontendAction::Execute() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:936:8
    #23 0x7f2a257 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:965:33
    #24 0x8288bef in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:290:25
    #25 0xad44c2 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:239:15
    #26 0xacd76a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:325:12
    #27 0xacc9fd in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:398:12
    #28 0x7f7d82cdb2e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #29 0xa4dde9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/clang-11+0xa4dde9)
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
Using the same strategy as c38e425.

D69825 revealed (introduced?) a problem when building with ASan, and
some memory leaks somewhere. More details are available in the original
patch.

Looks like we missed one failing tests, this patch adds the workaround
to this test as well.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
Using the same strategy as c38e425.

D69825 revealed (introduced?) a problem when building with ASan, and
some memory leaks somewhere. More details are available in the original
patch.

Looks like we missed one failing tests, this patch adds the workaround
to this test as well.

(cherry picked from commit e174da4)
vedantk added a commit to vedantk/apple-llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2020
…itions

This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec8, which
itself reverted fa4701e and 79daafc) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.

Original commit message:

This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.

We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.

This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.

As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.

Update #1:

Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:

1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
   to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
   list).

It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.

Update swiftlang#2:

Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.

Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.

rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350

(cherry picked from commit e08f205)
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2020
…itions

This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec8, which
itself reverted fa4701e and 79daafc) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.

Original commit message:

This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.

We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.

This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.

As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.

Update #1:

Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:

1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
   to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
   list).

It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.

Update #2:

Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.

Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.

rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2020
After a first attempt to fix the test-suite failures, my first recommit
caused the same failures again. I had updated CMakeList.txt files of
tests that needed -fcommon, but it turns out that there are also
Makefiles which are used by some bots, so I've updated these Makefiles
now too.

See the original commit message for more details on this change:
0a9fc92
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2020
This reverts commit dfecec6.

Merging the change revealed that there is a failure on the memory
sanitizer bots.

    Command Output (stderr):
    --
    ==3569==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
        #0 0x1d71bff in
           llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef,
    llvm::StringRef)
    /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7
        #1 0x1d721f8 in initializeSubtargetDependencies
           /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:50:3
        #2 0x1d721f8 in llvm::AVRSubtarget::AVRSubtarget(llvm::Triple
           const&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>,
    std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, std::__1::basic_string<char,
    std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&,
    llvm::AVRTargetMachine const&)
    /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRSubtarget.cpp:33:18
        #3 0x1d3077f in
           llvm::AVRTargetMachine::AVRTargetMachine(llvm::Target const&,
    llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef,
    llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>,
    llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool)
    /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/AVR/AVRTargetMachine.cpp:52:7
        #4 0x1d3169d in
           llvm::RegisterTargetMachine<llvm::AVRTargetMachine>::Allocator(llvm::Target
    const&, llvm::Triple const&, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef,
    llvm::TargetOptions const&, llvm::Optional<llvm::Reloc::Model>,
    llvm::Optional<llvm::CodeModel::Model>, llvm::CodeGenOpt::Level, bool)
    /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:1121:16
        #5 0x86662f in createTargetMachine
           /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h:402:12
        #6 0x86662f in compileModule(char**, llvm::LLVMContext&)
           /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:473:52
        #7 0x861f42 in main
           /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:356:22
        #8 0x7f76f7b072e0 in __libc_start_main
           (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
        #9 0x7ebbc9 in _start
           (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/llc+0x7ebbc9)

    SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/lib/Target/AVR/AVRGenSubtargetInfo.inc:471:7
    in llvm::AVRSubtarget::ParseSubtargetFeatures(llvm::StringRef,
    llvm::StringRef)
    Exiting
    FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty.
    --

The patch wiill be re-committed once fixed.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2020
Summary:
When moving add and sub to memory operand instructions,
aarch64-ldst-opt would prematurally pop the stack pointer,
before memory instructions that do access the stack using
indirect loads.
e.g.
```
int foo(int offset){
    int local[4] = {0};
    return local[offset];
}
```
would generate:
```
sub     sp, sp, #16            ; Push the stack
mov     x8, sp                 ; Save stack in register
stp     xzr, xzr, [sp], #16    ; Zero initialize stack, and post-increment, making it invalid
------ If an exception goes here, the stack value might be corrupted
ldr     w0, [x8, w0, sxtw #2]  ; Access correct position, but it is not guarded by SP
```

Reviewers: fhahn, foad, thegameg, eli.friedman, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: efriedma, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits, simon_tatham

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75755
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2020
Saves only 36 includes of ASTContext.h and related headers.

There are two deps on ASTContext.h:
- C++ method overrides iterator types (TinyPtrVector)
- getting LangOptions

For #1, duplicate the iterator type, which is
TinyPtrVector<>::const_iterator.

For #2, add an out-of-line accessor to get the language options. Getting
the ASTContext from a Decl is already an out of line method that loops
over the parent DeclContexts, so if it is ever performance critical, the
proper fix is to pass the context (or LangOpts) into the predicate in
question.

Other changes are just header fixups.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
Summary:
Previously `AtosSymbolizer` would set the PID to examine in the
constructor which is called early on during sanitizer init. This can
lead to incorrect behaviour in the case of a fork() because if the
symbolizer is launched in the child it will be told examine the parent
process rather than the child.

To fix this the PID is determined just before the symbolizer is
launched.

A test case is included that triggers the buggy behaviour that existed
prior to this patch. The test observes the PID that `atos` was called
on. It also examines the symbolized stacktrace. Prior to this patch
`atos` failed to symbolize the stacktrace giving output that looked
like...

```
  #0 0x100fc3bb5 in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace asan_stack.cpp:86
  #1 0x10490dd36 in PrintStack+0x56 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_shared_lib.dylib:x86_64+0xd36)
  #2 0x100f6f986 in main+0x4a6 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_loader:x86_64+0x100001986)
  #3 0x7fff714f1cc8 in start+0x0 (/usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8)
```

After this patch stackframes `#1` and `#2` are fully symbolized.

This patch is also a pre-requisite refactor for rdar://problem/58789439.

Reviewers: kubamracek, yln

Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77623
danliew-apple pushed a commit to danliew-apple/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2020
Summary:
Previously `AtosSymbolizer` would set the PID to examine in the
constructor which is called early on during sanitizer init. This can
lead to incorrect behaviour in the case of a fork() because if the
symbolizer is launched in the child it will be told examine the parent
process rather than the child.

To fix this the PID is determined just before the symbolizer is
launched.

A test case is included that triggers the buggy behaviour that existed
prior to this patch. The test observes the PID that `atos` was called
on. It also examines the symbolized stacktrace. Prior to this patch
`atos` failed to symbolize the stacktrace giving output that looked
like...

```
  #0 0x100fc3bb5 in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace asan_stack.cpp:86
  swiftlang#1 0x10490dd36 in PrintStack+0x56 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_shared_lib.dylib:x86_64+0xd36)
  swiftlang#2 0x100f6f986 in main+0x4a6 (/path/to/print-stack-trace-in-code-loaded-after-fork.cpp.tmp_loader:x86_64+0x100001986)
  swiftlang#3 0x7fff714f1cc8 in start+0x0 (/usr/lib/system/libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8)
```

After this patch stackframes `swiftlang#1` and `swiftlang#2` are fully symbolized.

This patch is also a pre-requisite refactor for rdar://problem/58789439.

Reviewers: kubamracek, yln

Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77623

(cherry picked from commit 8efc3cc)
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
Summary:
crash stack:

```
lang: tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1490: unsigned int clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext &) const: Assertion `!isAlignmentDependent()' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0.      Program arguments: ./bin/clang -cc1 -std=c++1y -ast-dump -frecovery-ast -fcxx-exceptions /tmp/t4.cpp
1.      /tmp/t4.cpp:3:31: current parser token ';'
 #0 0x0000000002530cff llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:564:13
 #1 0x000000000252ee30 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:69:18
 #2 0x000000000253126c SignalHandler(int) llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:396:3
 #3 0x00007f86964d0520 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x13520)
 #4 0x00007f8695f9ff61 raise /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51:1
 #5 0x00007f8695f8b535 abort /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/stdlib/abort.c:81:7
 #6 0x00007f8695f8b40f _nl_load_domain /build/glibc-oCLvUT/glibc-2.29/intl/loadmsgcat.c:1177:9
 #7 0x00007f8695f98b92 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x32b92)
 #8 0x0000000004503d9f llvm::APInt::getZExtValue() const llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:1623:5
 #9 0x0000000004503d9f clang::AlignedAttr::getAlignment(clang::ASTContext&) const llvm-project/build/tools/clang/include/clang/AST/AttrImpl.inc:1492:0
```

Reviewers: sammccall

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78085
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2020
Bitcode file alignment is only 32-bit so 64-bit offsets need
special handling.
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28: runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x7fca2bcfe54c for type 'const uint64_t' (aka 'const unsigned long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x7fca2bcfe54c: note: pointer points here
  00 00 00 00 5a a6 01 00  00 00 00 00 19 a7 01 00  00 00 00 00 48 a7 01 00  00 00 00 00 7d a7 01 00
              ^
    #0 0x3be2fe4 in clang::ASTReader::TypeCursorForIndex(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6327:28
    #1 0x3be30a0 in clang::ASTReader::readTypeRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6348:24
    #2 0x3bd3d4a in clang::ASTReader::GetType(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:6985:26
    #3 0x3c5d9ae in clang::ASTDeclReader::Visit(clang::Decl*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:533:31
    #4 0x3c91cac in clang::ASTReader::ReadDeclRecord(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:4045:10
    #5 0x3bd4fb1 in clang::ASTReader::GetDecl(unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:7352:5
    #6 0x3bce2f9 in clang::ASTReader::ReadASTBlock(clang::serialization::ModuleFile&, unsigned int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:3625:22
    #7 0x3bd6d75 in clang::ASTReader::ReadAST(llvm::StringRef, clang::serialization::ModuleKind, clang::SourceLocation, unsigned int, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<clang::ASTReader::ImportedSubmodule>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:4230:32
    #8 0x3a6b415 in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, clang::Preprocessor&, clang::InMemoryModuleCache&, clang::ASTContext&, clang::PCHContainerReader const&, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::ModuleFileExtension> >, llvm::ArrayRef<std::shared_ptr<clang::DependencyCollector> >, void*, bool, bool, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:539:19
    #9 0x3a6b00e in clang::CompilerInstance::createPCHExternalASTSource(llvm::StringRef, bool, bool, void*, bool) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:501:18
    #10 0x3abac80 in clang::FrontendAction::BeginSourceFile(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::FrontendInputFile const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:865:12
    #11 0x3a6e61c in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:972:13
    #12 0x3ba74bf in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:282:25
    #13 0xa3f753 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:240:15
    #14 0xa3a68a in ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:330:12
    #15 0xa37f31 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:407:12
    #16 0x7fca2a7032e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #17 0xa21029 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang-11+0xa21029)

This reverts commit 30d5946.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2020
Summary:
For some reason the TestExec test on the macOS bots randomly fails with this error:
```
output: * thread #2, stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x108e66000)
  * frame #0: 0x0000000108e66000
[...]
  File "/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/exec/TestExec.py", line 25, in test_hitting_exec
    self.do_test(False)
  File "/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/exec/TestExec.py", line 113, in do_test
    "Stopped at breakpoint in exec'ed process.")
AssertionError: False is not True : Stopped at breakpoint in exec'ed process.
Config=x86_64-/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang-11
```

I don't know why the test program is failing and I couldn't reproduce this problem on my own.
This patch is a stab in the dark that just tries to make the test code more similar to code which
we would expect in a user program to make whatever part of macOS happy that is currently
not liking our code.

The actual changes are:
* We pass in argv[0] that is describing otherprog path instead of the current argv[0].
* We pass in a non-null envp (which anyway doesn't seem to be allowed on macOS man page).

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75241
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
…ates explicitly specialized for an implicitly instantiated class template specialization (llvm#113464)

Consider the following:
```
template<typename T>
struct A {
  template<typename U>
  struct B {
    static constexpr int x = 0; // #1
  };

  template<typename U>
  struct B<U*> {
    static constexpr int x = 1; // #2
  };
};

template<>
template<typename U>
struct A<long>::B {
  static constexpr int x = 2; // #3
};

static_assert(A<short>::B<int>::y == 0); // uses #1
static_assert(A<short>::B<int*>::y == 1); // uses #2

static_assert(A<long>::B<int>::y == 2); // uses #3
static_assert(A<long>::B<int*>::y == 2); // uses #3
```

According to [temp.spec.partial.member] p2:
> If the primary member template is explicitly specialized for a given
(implicit) specialization of the enclosing class template, the partial
specializations of the member template are ignored for this
specialization of the enclosing class template.
If a partial specialization of the member template is explicitly
specialized for a given (implicit) specialization of the enclosing class
template, the primary member template and its other partial
specializations are still considered for this specialization of the
enclosing class template.

The example above fails to compile because we currently don't implement
[temp.spec.partial.member] p2. This patch implements the wording, fixing llvm#51051.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
… depobj construct (llvm#114221)

A codegen crash is occurring when a depend object was initialized with
omp_all_memory in the depobj directive.
llvm#114214
The root cause of issue looks to be the improper handling of the
dependency list when omp_all_memory was specified.

The change introduces the use of OMPTaskDataTy to manage dependencies.
The buildDependences function is called to construct the dependency
list, and the list is iterated over to emit and store the dependencies.

Reduced Test Case : 
```
#include <omp.h>

int main()

{ omp_depend_t obj; #pragma omp depobj(obj) depend(inout: omp_all_memory) }
```

```
 #1 0x0000000003de6623 SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0
 #2 0x00007f8e4a6b990f (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x1690f)
 #3 0x00007f8e4a117d2a raise (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x4ad2a)
 #4 0x00007f8e4a1193e4 abort (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x4c3e4)
 #5 0x00007f8e4a10fc69 __assert_fail_base (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x42c69)
 #6 0x00007f8e4a10fcf1 __assert_fail (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x42cf1)
 #7 0x0000000004114367 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitOMPDepobjDirective(clang::OMPDepobjDirective const&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4114367)
 #8 0x00000000040f8fac clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitStmt(clang::Stmt const*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Attr const*>) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x40f8fac)
 #9 0x00000000040ff4fb clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitCompoundStmtWithoutScope(clang::CompoundStmt const&, bool, clang::CodeGen::AggValueSlot) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x40ff4fb)
#10 0x00000000041847b2 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitFunctionBody(clang::Stmt const*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41847b2)
#11 0x0000000004199e4a clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::GenerateCode(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::Function*, clang::CodeGen::CGFunctionInfo const&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4199e4a)
#12 0x00000000041f7b9d clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalFunctionDefinition(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::GlobalValue*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41f7b9d)
#13 0x00000000041f16a3 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalDefinition(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::GlobalValue*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41f16a3)
#14 0x00000000041fd954 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitDeferred() (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x41fd954)
#15 0x0000000004200277 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::Release() (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4200277)
#16 0x00000000046b6a49 (anonymous namespace)::CodeGeneratorImpl::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) ModuleBuilder.cpp:0:0
#17 0x00000000046b4cb6 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTranslationUnit(clang::ASTContext&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x46b4cb6)
#18 0x0000000006204d5c clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x6204d5c)
#19 0x000000000496b278 clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x496b278)
#20 0x00000000048dd074 clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x48dd074)
#21 0x0000000004a38092 clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0x4a38092)
#22 0x0000000000fd4e9c cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0xfd4e9c)
#23 0x0000000000fcca73 ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0
#24 0x0000000000fd140c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0xfd140c)
#25 0x0000000000ee2ef3 main (/opt/cray/pe/cce/18.0.1/cce-clang/x86_64/bin/clang-18+0xee2ef3)
#26 0x00007f8e4a10224c __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3524c)
#27 0x0000000000fcaae9 _start /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.31/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:120:0
clang: error: unable to execute command: Aborted
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Chandra Ghale <ghale@pe31.hpc.amslabs.hpecorp.net>
Michael137 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
This was reported by a test-suite run in a local ASAN/UBSAN build on my M1:
```
=================================================================
==69533==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x000106b68e50 at pc 0x00011cacfaa4 bp 0x00016b8c7ff0 sp 0x00016b8c7fe8
READ of size 8 at 0x000106b68e50 thread T0
    #0 0x11cacfaa0 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetChildAtNamePath(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>) ValueObject.cpp:471
    #1 0x11ce85908 in lldb_private::formatters::NSTimeZoneSummaryProvider(lldb_private::ValueObject&, lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) Cocoa.cpp:157
    #2 0x11c51bad0 in lldb_private::CXXFunctionSummaryFormat::FormatObject(lldb_private::ValueObject*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) TypeSummary.cpp:129
    #3 0x11cad2eb4 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:691
    #4 0x11cad2b18 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb::LanguageType) ValueObject.cpp:648
    #5 0x11c528d38 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::GetValueSummaryError(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_strin
g<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:402
    #6 0x11c526604 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueAndSummaryIfNeeded(bool&, bool&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:420
    #7 0x11c524748 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueObject() ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:91
    #8 0x11cae7a10 in lldb_private::ValueObject::Dump(lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::DumpValueObjectOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:2826
    #9 0x11d9ed628 in CommandObjectFrameVariable::DoExecute(lldb_private::Args&, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObjectFrame.cpp:679
    #10 0x11c67f3e4 in lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const*, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObject.cpp:826
    #11 0x11c65f9d4 in lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb_private::LazyBool, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&, bool) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2101
    #12 0x11bdb72a8 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBExecutionContext&, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:194
    #13 0x11bdb6a00 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:176
    #14 0x11c1612e8 in _wrap_SBCommandInterpreter_HandleCommand(_object*, _object*) LLDBWrapPython.cpp:16926
```

I'm not sure why this doesn't show up in the public ASAN bot, but
binding a temporary initializer-list to a non-owning `ArrayRef` like
this isn't safe.
Michael137 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
This was reported by a test-suite run in a local ASAN/UBSAN build on my M1:
```
=================================================================
==69533==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x000106b68e50 at pc 0x00011cacfaa4 bp 0x00016b8c7ff0 sp 0x00016b8c7fe8
READ of size 8 at 0x000106b68e50 thread T0
    #0 0x11cacfaa0 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetChildAtNamePath(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>) ValueObject.cpp:471
    #1 0x11ce85908 in lldb_private::formatters::NSTimeZoneSummaryProvider(lldb_private::ValueObject&, lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) Cocoa.cpp:157
    #2 0x11c51bad0 in lldb_private::CXXFunctionSummaryFormat::FormatObject(lldb_private::ValueObject*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) TypeSummary.cpp:129
    #3 0x11cad2eb4 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:691
    #4 0x11cad2b18 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb::LanguageType) ValueObject.cpp:648
    #5 0x11c528d38 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::GetValueSummaryError(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_strin
g<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:402
    #6 0x11c526604 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueAndSummaryIfNeeded(bool&, bool&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:420
    #7 0x11c524748 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueObject() ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:91
    #8 0x11cae7a10 in lldb_private::ValueObject::Dump(lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::DumpValueObjectOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:2826
    #9 0x11d9ed628 in CommandObjectFrameVariable::DoExecute(lldb_private::Args&, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObjectFrame.cpp:679
    #10 0x11c67f3e4 in lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const*, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObject.cpp:826
    #11 0x11c65f9d4 in lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb_private::LazyBool, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&, bool) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2101
    #12 0x11bdb72a8 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBExecutionContext&, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:194
    #13 0x11bdb6a00 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:176
    #14 0x11c1612e8 in _wrap_SBCommandInterpreter_HandleCommand(_object*, _object*) LLDBWrapPython.cpp:16926
```

I'm not sure why this doesn't show up in the public ASAN bot, but
binding a temporary initializer-list to a non-owning `ArrayRef` like
this isn't safe.
Michael137 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
…an-to-20240723

[lldb][ObjC] Fix use-after-scope in NSTimeZoneSummaryProvider

This was reported by a test-suite run in a local ASAN/UBSAN build on my M1:
```
=================================================================
==69533==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x000106b68e50 at pc 0x00011cacfaa4 bp 0x00016b8c7ff0 sp 0x00016b8c7fe8
READ of size 8 at 0x000106b68e50 thread T0
    #0 0x11cacfaa0 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetChildAtNamePath(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>) ValueObject.cpp:471
    #1 0x11ce85908 in lldb_private::formatters::NSTimeZoneSummaryProvider(lldb_private::ValueObject&, lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) Cocoa.cpp:157
    #2 0x11c51bad0 in lldb_private::CXXFunctionSummaryFormat::FormatObject(lldb_private::ValueObject*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) TypeSummary.cpp:129
    #3 0x11cad2eb4 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:691
    #4 0x11cad2b18 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb::LanguageType) ValueObject.cpp:648
    #5 0x11c528d38 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::GetValueSummaryError(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_strin
g<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:402
    #6 0x11c526604 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueAndSummaryIfNeeded(bool&, bool&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:420
    #7 0x11c524748 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueObject() ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:91
    #8 0x11cae7a10 in lldb_private::ValueObject::Dump(lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::DumpValueObjectOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:2826
    #9 0x11d9ed628 in CommandObjectFrameVariable::DoExecute(lldb_private::Args&, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObjectFrame.cpp:679
    #10 0x11c67f3e4 in lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const*, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObject.cpp:826
    #11 0x11c65f9d4 in lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb_private::LazyBool, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&, bool) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2101
    #12 0x11bdb72a8 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBExecutionContext&, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:194
    #13 0x11bdb6a00 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:176
    #14 0x11c1612e8 in _wrap_SBCommandInterpreter_HandleCommand(_object*, _object*) LLDBWrapPython.cpp:16926
```

I'm not sure why this doesn't show up in the public ASAN bot, but binding a temporary initializer-list to a non-owning `ArrayRef` like this isn't safe.
Michael137 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
…an-to-next

[lldb][ObjC] Fix use-after-scope in NSTimeZoneSummaryProvider

This was reported by a test-suite run in a local ASAN/UBSAN build on my M1:
```
=================================================================
==69533==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address 0x000106b68e50 at pc 0x00011cacfaa4 bp 0x00016b8c7ff0 sp 0x00016b8c7fe8
READ of size 8 at 0x000106b68e50 thread T0
    #0 0x11cacfaa0 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetChildAtNamePath(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef>) ValueObject.cpp:471
    #1 0x11ce85908 in lldb_private::formatters::NSTimeZoneSummaryProvider(lldb_private::ValueObject&, lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) Cocoa.cpp:157
    #2 0x11c51bad0 in lldb_private::CXXFunctionSummaryFormat::FormatObject(lldb_private::ValueObject*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) TypeSummary.cpp:129
    #3 0x11cad2eb4 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb_private::TypeSummaryOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:691
    #4 0x11cad2b18 in lldb_private::ValueObject::GetSummaryAsCString(lldb_private::TypeSummaryImpl*, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, lldb::LanguageType) ValueObject.cpp:648
    #5 0x11c528d38 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::GetValueSummaryError(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&, std::__1::basic_strin
g<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>>&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:402
    #6 0x11c526604 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueAndSummaryIfNeeded(bool&, bool&) ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:420
    #7 0x11c524748 in lldb_private::ValueObjectPrinter::PrintValueObject() ValueObjectPrinter.cpp:91
    #8 0x11cae7a10 in lldb_private::ValueObject::Dump(lldb_private::Stream&, lldb_private::DumpValueObjectOptions const&) ValueObject.cpp:2826
    #9 0x11d9ed628 in CommandObjectFrameVariable::DoExecute(lldb_private::Args&, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObjectFrame.cpp:679
    #10 0x11c67f3e4 in lldb_private::CommandObjectParsed::Execute(char const*, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&) CommandObject.cpp:826
    #11 0x11c65f9d4 in lldb_private::CommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb_private::LazyBool, lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&, bool) CommandInterpreter.cpp:2101
    #12 0x11bdb72a8 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBExecutionContext&, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:194
    #13 0x11bdb6a00 in lldb::SBCommandInterpreter::HandleCommand(char const*, lldb::SBCommandReturnObject&, bool) SBCommandInterpreter.cpp:176
    #14 0x11c1612e8 in _wrap_SBCommandInterpreter_HandleCommand(_object*, _object*) LLDBWrapPython.cpp:16926
```

I'm not sure why this doesn't show up in the public ASAN bot, but binding a temporary initializer-list to a non-owning `ArrayRef` like this isn't safe.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
…onger cause a crash (llvm#116569)

This PR fixes a bug introduced by llvm#110199, which causes any half float
argument to crash the compiler on MIPS64.

Currently compiling this bit of code with `llc -mtriple=mips64`: 
```
define void @half_args(half %a) nounwind {
entry:
        ret void
}
```

Crashes with the following log:
```
LLVM ERROR: unable to allocate function argument #0
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0.	Program arguments: llc -mtriple=mips64
1.	Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '<stdin>'.
2.	Running pass 'MIPS DAG->DAG Pattern Instruction Selection' on function '@half_args'
 #0 0x000055a3a4013df8 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x32d0df8)
 #1 0x000055a3a401199e llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x32ce99e)
 #2 0x000055a3a40144a8 SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0
 #3 0x00007f00bde558c0 __restore_rt libc_sigaction.c:0:0
 #4 0x00007f00bdea462c __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76
 #5 0x00007f00bde55822 gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6
 #6 0x00007f00bde3e4af abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7
 #7 0x000055a3a3f80e3c llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&, bool) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x323de3c)
 #8 0x000055a3a2e20dfa (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x20dddfa)
 #9 0x000055a3a2a34e20 llvm::MipsTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments(llvm::SDValue, unsigned int, bool, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::ISD::InputArg> const&, llvm::SDLoc const&, llvm::SelectionDAG&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::SDValue>&) const MipsISelLowering.cpp:0:0
#10 0x000055a3a3d896a9 llvm::SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments(llvm::Function const&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x30466a9)
#11 0x000055a3a3e0b3ec llvm::SelectionDAGISel::SelectAllBasicBlocks(llvm::Function const&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x30c83ec)
#12 0x000055a3a3e09e21 llvm::SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x30c6e21)
#13 0x000055a3a2aae1ca llvm::MipsDAGToDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) MipsISelDAGToDAG.cpp:0:0
#14 0x000055a3a3e07706 llvm::SelectionDAGISelLegacy::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x30c4706)
#15 0x000055a3a3051ed6 llvm::MachineFunctionPass::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x230eed6)
#16 0x000055a3a35a3ec9 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x2860ec9)
#17 0x000055a3a35ac3b2 llvm::FPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x28693b2)
#18 0x000055a3a35a499c llvm::legacy::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x286199c)
#19 0x000055a3a262abbb main (/home/davide/Ps2/rps2-tools/prefix/bin/llc+0x18e7bbb)
#20 0x00007f00bde3fc4c __libc_start_call_main ./csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:74:3
#21 0x00007f00bde3fd05 call_init ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:128:20
#22 0x00007f00bde3fd05 __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 ./csu/../csu/libc-start.c:347:5
#23 0x000055a3a2624921 _start /builddir/glibc-2.39/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:117:0
```

This is caused by the fact that after the change, `f16`s are no longer
lowered as `f32`s in calls.

Two possible fixes are available:
- Update calling conventions to properly support passing `f16` as
integers.
- Update `useFPRegsForHalfType()` to return `true` so that `f16` are
still kept in `f32` registers, as before llvm#110199.

This PR implements the first solution to not introduce any more ABI
changes as llvm#110199 already did.

As of what is the correct ABI for halfs, I don't think there is a
correct answer. GCC doesn't support halfs on MIPS, and I couldn't find
any information on old MIPS ABI manuals either.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
…#116656)

The main issue to solve is that OpenMP modifiers can be specified in any
order, so the parser cannot expect any specific modifier at a given
position. To solve that, define modifier to be a union of all allowable
specific modifiers for a given clause.

Additionally, implement modifier descriptors: for each modifier the
corresponding descriptor contains a set of properties of the modifier
that allow a common set of semantic checks. Start with the syntactic
properties defined in the spec: Required, Unique, Exclusive, Ultimate,
and implement common checks to verify each of them.

OpenMP modifier overhaul: #2/3
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
…plementation (llvm#108413. llvm#117704) (llvm#117894)

Relands llvm#117704, which relanded changes from llvm#108413 - this was reverted
due to build issues. The new offload library did not build with
`LIBOMPTARGET_OMPT_SUPPORT` enabled, which was not picked up by
pre-merge testing.

The last commit contains the fix; everything else is otherwise identical
to the approved PR.
___

### New API

Previous discussions at the LLVM/Offload meeting have brought up the
need for a new API for exposing the functionality of the plugins. This
change introduces a very small subset of a new API, which is primarily
for testing the offload tooling and demonstrating how a new API can fit
into the existing code base without being too disruptive. Exact designs
for these entry points and future additions can be worked out over time.

The new API does however introduce the bare minimum functionality to
implement device discovery for Unified Runtime and SYCL. This means that
the `urinfo` and `sycl-ls` tools can be used on top of Offload. A
(rough) implementation of a Unified Runtime adapter (aka plugin) for
Offload is available
[here](https://github.com/callumfare/unified-runtime/tree/offload_adapter).
Our intention is to maintain this and use it to implement and test
Offload API changes with SYCL.

### Demoing the new API

```sh
# From the runtime build directory
$ ninja LibomptUnitTests
$ OFFLOAD_TRACE=1 ./offload/unittests/OffloadAPI/offload.unittests 
```


### Open questions and future work
* Only some of the available device info is exposed, and not all the
possible device queries needed for SYCL are implemented by the plugins.
A sensible next step would be to refactor and extend the existing device
info queries in the plugins. The existing info queries are all strings,
but the new API introduces the ability to return any arbitrary type.
* It may be sensible at some point for the plugins to implement the new
API directly, and the higher level code on top of it could be made
generic, but this is more of a long-term possibility.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
…abort (llvm#117603)

Hey guys, I found that Flang's built-in ABORT function is incomplete
when I was using it. Compared with gfortran's ABORT (which can both
abort and print out a backtrace), flang's ABORT implementation lacks the
function of printing out a backtrace. This feature is essential for
debugging and understanding the call stack at the failure point.

To solve this problem, I completed the "// TODO:" of the abort function,
and then implemented an additional built-in function BACKTRACE for
flang. After a brief reading of the relevant source code, I used
backtrace and backtrace_symbols in "execinfo.h" to quickly implement
this. But since I used the above two functions directly, my
implementation is slightly different from gfortran's implementation (in
the output, the function call stack before main is additionally output,
and the function line number is missing). In addition, since I used the
above two functions, I did not need to add -g to embed debug information
into the ELF file, but needed -rdynamic to ensure that the symbols are
added to the dynamic symbol table (so that the function name will be
printed out).

Here is a comparison of the output between gfortran 's backtrace and my
implementation:
gfortran's implemention output:
```
#0  0x557eb71f4184 in testfun2_
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:5
#1  0x557eb71f4165 in testfun1_
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:13
#2  0x557eb71f4192 in test_backtrace
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:17
#3  0x557eb71f41ce in main
        at /home/hunter/plct/fortran/test.f90:18
```
my impelmention output:
```
Backtrace:
#0 ./test(_FortranABacktrace+0x32) [0x574f07efcf92]
#1 ./test(testfun2_+0x14) [0x574f07efc7b4]
#2 ./test(testfun1_+0xd) [0x574f07efc7cd]
#3 ./test(_QQmain+0x9) [0x574f07efc7e9]
#4 ./test(main+0x12) [0x574f07efc802]
#5 /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x25e08) [0x76954694fe08]
#6 /usr/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8c) [0x76954694fecc]
#7 ./test(_start+0x25) [0x574f07efc6c5]
```
test program is:
```
function testfun2() result(err)
  implicit none
  integer :: err
  err = 1
  call backtrace
end function testfun2

subroutine testfun1()
  implicit none
  integer :: err
  integer :: testfun2

  err = testfun2()
end subroutine testfun1

program test_backtrace
  call testfun1()
end program test_backtrace
```
I am well aware of the importance of line numbers, so I am now working
on implementing line numbers (by parsing DWARF information) and
supporting cross-platform (Windows) support.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
…ne symbol size as symbols are created (llvm#117079)"

This reverts commit ba668eb.

Below test started failing again on x86_64 macOS CI. We're unsure
if this patch is the exact cause, but since this patch has broken
this test before, we speculatively revert it to see if it was indeed
the root cause.
```
FAIL: lldb-shell :: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test (1692 of 2162)
******************** TEST 'lldb-shell :: Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 7: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/call-asm.c /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/trap_frame_sym_ctx.s -o /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp
+ /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/clang --target=specify-a-target-or-use-a-_host-substitution --target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/call-asm.c /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Inputs/trap_frame_sym_ctx.s -o /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp
clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fmodules-cache-path=/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/lldb-test-build.noindex/module-cache-clang/lldb-shell' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
RUN: at line 8: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/lldb --no-lldbinit -S /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/lit-lldb-init-quiet /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp -s /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -o exit | /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/FileCheck /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test
+ /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/lldb --no-lldbinit -S /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/lit-lldb-init-quiet /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/tools/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/Output/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp -s /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test -o exit
+ /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/lldb-build/bin/FileCheck /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test
/Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test:21:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
         ^
<stdin>:26:64: note: scanning from here
 frame #1: 0x0000000100003ee9 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`tramp
                                                               ^
<stdin>:27:2: note: possible intended match here
 frame #2: 0x00007ff7bfeff6c0
 ^

Input file: <stdin>
Check file: /Users/ec2-user/jenkins/workspace/llvm.org/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/lldb/test/Shell/Unwind/trap_frame_sym_ctx.test

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
            .
            .
            .
           21:  0x100003ed1 <+0>: pushq %rbp
           22:  0x100003ed2 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp
           23: (lldb) thread backtrace -u
           24: * thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
           25:  * frame #0: 0x0000000100003ecc trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`bar
           26:  frame #1: 0x0000000100003ee9 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`tramp
check:21'0                                                                    X error: no match found
           27:  frame #2: 0x00007ff7bfeff6c0
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
check:21'1      ?                             possible intended match
           28:  frame #3: 0x0000000100003ec6 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`main + 22
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           29:  frame #4: 0x0000000100003ec6 trap_frame_sym_ctx.test.tmp`main + 22
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           30:  frame #5: 0x00007ff8193cc41f dyld`start + 1903
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           31: (lldb) exit
check:21'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>>
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
## Description

This PR fixes a segmentation fault that occurs when passing options
requiring arguments via `-Xopenmp-target=<triple>`. The issue was that
the function `Driver::getOffloadArchs` did not properly parse the
extracted option, but instead assumed it was valid, leading to a crash
when incomplete arguments were provided.

## Backtrace

```sh
llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o 
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0.      Program arguments: llvm-project/build/bin/clang++ main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -Xopenmp-target=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu -o
1.      Compilation construction
2.      Building compilation actions
 #0 0x0000562fb21c363b llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x392f63b)
 #1 0x0000562fb21c0e3c SignalHandler(int) Signals.cpp:0:0
 #2 0x00007fcbf6c81420 __restore_rt (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0+0x14420)
 #3 0x0000562fb1fa5d70 llvm::opt::Option::matches(llvm::opt::OptSpecifier) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x3711d70)
 #4 0x0000562fb2a78e7d clang::driver::Driver::getOffloadArchs(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList const&, clang::driver::Action::OffloadKind, clang::driver::ToolChain const*, bool) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e4e7d)
 #5 0x0000562fb2a7a9aa clang::driver::Driver::BuildOffloadingActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*> const&, clang::driver::Action*) const (.part.1164) Driver.cpp:0:0
 #6 0x0000562fb2a7c093 clang::driver::Driver::BuildActions(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::opt::DerivedArgList&, llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<clang::driver::types::ID, llvm::opt::Arg const*>, 16u> const&, llvm::SmallVector<clang::driver::Action*, 3u>&) const (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41e8093)
 #7 0x0000562fb2a8395d clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x41ef95d)
 #8 0x0000562faf92684c clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x109284c)
 #9 0x0000562faf826cc6 main (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0xf92cc6)
#10 0x00007fcbf6699083 __libc_start_main /build/glibc-LcI20x/glibc-2.31/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:342:3
#11 0x0000562faf923a5e _start (llvm-project/build/bin/clang+++0x108fa5e)
[1]    2628042 segmentation fault (core dumped)   main.cpp -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=powerpc64le-ibm-linux-gnu  -o
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2024
llvm#118923)

…d reentry.

These utilities provide new, more generic and easier to use support for
lazy compilation in ORC.

LazyReexportsManager is an alternative to LazyCallThroughManager. It
takes requests for lazy re-entry points in the form of an alias map:
lazy-reexports = {
  ( <entry point symbol #1>, <implementation symbol #1> ),
  ( <entry point symbol #2>, <implementation symbol #2> ),
  ...
  ( <entry point symbol #n>, <implementation symbol #n> )
}

LazyReexportsManager then:
1. binds the entry points to the implementation names in an internal
table.
2. creates a JIT re-entry trampoline for each entry point.
3. creates a redirectable symbol for each of the entry point name and
binds redirectable symbol to the corresponding reentry trampoline.

When an entry point symbol is first called at runtime (which may be on
any thread of the JIT'd program) it will re-enter the JIT via the
trampoline and trigger a lookup for the implementation symbol stored in
LazyReexportsManager's internal table. When the lookup completes the
entry point symbol will be updated (via the RedirectableSymbolManager)
to point at the implementation symbol, and execution will proceed to the
implementation symbol.

Actual construction of the re-entry trampolines and redirectable symbols
is delegated to an EmitTrampolines functor and the
RedirectableSymbolsManager respectively.

JITLinkReentryTrampolines.h provides a JITLink-based implementation of
the EmitTrampolines functor. (AArch64 only in this patch, but other
architectures will be added in the near future).

Register state save and reentry functionality is added to the ORC
runtime in the __orc_rt_sysv_resolve and __orc_rt_resolve_implementation
functions (the latter is generic, the former will need custom
implementations for each ABI and architecture to be supported, however
this should be much less effort than the existing OrcABISupport
approach, since the ORC runtime allows this code to be written as native
assembly).

The resulting system:
1. Works equally well for in-process and out-of-process JIT'd code.
2. Requires less boilerplate to set up.

Given an ObjectLinkingLayer and PlatformJD (JITDylib containing the ORC
runtime), setup is just:

```c++
auto RSMgr = JITLinkRedirectableSymbolManager::Create(OLL);
if (!RSMgr)
  return RSMgr.takeError();

auto LRMgr = createJITLinkLazyReexportsManager(OLL, **RSMgr, PlatformJD);
if (!LRMgr)
  return LRMgr.takeError();
```

after which lazy reexports can be introduced with:

```c++
JD.define(lazyReexports(LRMgr, <alias map>));
```

LazyObectLinkingLayer is updated to use this new method, but the LLVM-IR
level CompileOnDemandLayer will continue to use LazyCallThroughManager
and OrcABISupport until the new system supports a wider range of
architectures and ABIs.

The llvm-jitlink utility's -lazy option now uses the new scheme. Since
it depends on the ORC runtime, the lazy-link.ll testcase and associated
helpers are moved to the ORC runtime.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
The Clang binary (and any binary linking Clang as a library), when built
using PIE, ends up with a pretty shocking number of dynamic relocations
to apply to the executable image: roughly 400k.

Each of these takes up binary space in the executable, and perhaps most
interestingly takes start-up time to apply the relocations.

The largest pattern I identified were the strings used to describe
target builtins. The addresses of these string literals were stored into
huge arrays, each one requiring a dynamic relocation. The way to avoid
this is to design the target builtins to use a single large table of
strings and offsets within the table for the individual strings. This
switches the builtin management to such a scheme.

This saves over 100k dynamic relocations by my measurement, an over 25%
reduction. Just looking at byte size improvements, using the `bloaty`
tool to compare a newly built `clang` binary to an old one:

```
    FILE SIZE        VM SIZE
 --------------  --------------
  +1.4%  +653Ki  +1.4%  +653Ki    .rodata
  +0.0%    +960  +0.0%    +960    .text
  +0.0%    +197  +0.0%    +197    .dynstr
  +0.0%    +184  +0.0%    +184    .eh_frame
  +0.0%     +96  +0.0%     +96    .dynsym
  +0.0%     +40  +0.0%     +40    .eh_frame_hdr
  +114%     +32  [ = ]       0    [Unmapped]
  +0.0%     +20  +0.0%     +20    .gnu.hash
  +0.0%      +8  +0.0%      +8    .gnu.version
  +0.9%      +7  +0.9%      +7    [LOAD #2 [R]]
  [ = ]       0 -75.4% -3.00Ki    .relro_padding
 -16.1%  -802Ki -16.1%  -802Ki    .data.rel.ro
 -27.3% -2.52Mi -27.3% -2.52Mi    .rela.dyn
  -1.6% -2.66Mi  -1.6% -2.66Mi    TOTAL
```

We get a 16% reduction in the `.data.rel.ro` section, and nearly 30%
reduction in `.rela.dyn` where those reloctaions are stored.

This is also visible in my benchmarking of binary start-up overhead at
least:

```
Benchmark 1: ./old_clang --version
  Time (mean ± σ):      17.6 ms ±   1.5 ms    [User: 4.1 ms, System: 13.3 ms]
  Range (min … max):    14.2 ms …  22.8 ms    162 runs

Benchmark 2: ./new_clang --version
  Time (mean ± σ):      15.5 ms ±   1.4 ms    [User: 3.6 ms, System: 11.8 ms]
  Range (min … max):    12.4 ms …  20.3 ms    216 runs

Summary
  './new_clang --version' ran
    1.13 ± 0.14 times faster than './old_clang --version'
```

We get about 2ms faster `--version` runs. While there is a lot of noise
in binary execution time, this delta is pretty consistent, and
represents over 10% improvement. This is particularly interesting to me
because for very short source files, repeatedly starting the `clang`
binary is actually the dominant cost. For example, `configure` scripts
running against the `clang` compiler are slow in large part because of
binary start up time, not the time to process the actual inputs to the
compiler.

----

This PR implements the string tables using `constexpr` code and the
existing macro system. I understand that the builtins are moving towards
a TableGen model, and if complete that would provide more options for
modeling this. Unfortunately, that migration isn't complete, and even
the parts that are migrated still rely on the ability to break out of
the TableGen model and directly expand an X-macro style `BUILTIN(...)`
textually. I looked at trying to complete the move to TableGen, but it
would both require the difficult migration of the remaining targets, and
solving some tricky problems with how to move away from any macro-based
expansion.

I was also able to find a reasonably clean and effective way of doing
this with the existing macros and some `constexpr` code that I think is
clean enough to be a pretty good intermediate state, and maybe give a
good target for the eventual TableGen solution. I was also able to
factor the macros into set of consistent patterns that avoids a
significant regression in overall boilerplate.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
llvm#123877)

Reverts llvm#122811 due to buildbot breakage e.g.,
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/5421/steps/11/logs/stdio

ASan output from local re-run:
```
==2780289==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7e0b87e28d28 at pc 0x55a979a99e7e bp 0x7ffe4b18f0b0 sp 0x7ffe4b18f0a8
READ of size 1 at 0x7e0b87e28d28 thread T0
    #0 0x55a979a99e7d in getStorageClass /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:344
    #1 0x55a979a99e7d in isSectionDefinition /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Object/COFF.h:429:9
    #2 0x55a979a99e7d in getSymbols /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:54:42
    #3 0x55a979a99e7d in lld::coff::writeLLDMapFile(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/LLDMapFile.cpp:103:40
    #4 0x55a979a16879 in (anonymous namespace)::Writer::run() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:810:3
    #5 0x55a979a00aac in lld::coff::writeResult(lld::coff::COFFLinkerContext&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Writer.cpp:354:15
    #6 0x55a97985f7ed in lld::coff::LinkerDriver::linkerMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:2826:3
    #7 0x55a97984cdd3 in lld::coff::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, bool, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/COFF/Driver.cpp:97:15
    #8 0x55a9797f9793 in lld::unsafeLldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>, bool) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:163:12
    #9 0x55a9797fa3b6 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:188:15
    #10 0x55a9797fa3b6 in void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>)::$_0>(long) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:46:12
    #11 0x55a97966cb93 in operator() /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLFunctionalExtras.h:69:12
    #12 0x55a97966cb93 in llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:426:3
    #13 0x55a9797f9dc3 in lld::lldMain(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::raw_ostream&, llvm::ArrayRef<lld::DriverDef>) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/Common/DriverDispatcher.cpp:187:14
    #14 0x55a979627512 in lld_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm-project/lld/tools/lld/lld.cpp:103:14
    #15 0x55a979628731 in main /usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/tools/lld/tools/lld/lld-driver.cpp:17:10
    #16 0x7ffb8b202c89 in __libc_start_call_main csu/../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58:16
    #17 0x7ffb8b202d44 in __libc_start_main csu/../csu/libc-start.c:360:3
    #18 0x55a97953ef60 in _start (/usr/local/google/home/thurston/buildbot_repro/llvm_build_asan/bin/lld+0x8fd1f60)
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
We can't guaranty that underlying string is
0-terminated and [String.size()] is even in the
same allocation.


https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/94/builds/4152/steps/17/logs/stdio
```
==c-index-test==1846256==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
    #0  in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:96:36
    #1  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:521:39
    #2  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7
    #3  in DumpCXCommentInternal llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:674:7
    #4  in DumpCXComment llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:685:3
    #5  in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:768:7

  Memory was marked as uninitialized
    #0  in __msan_allocated_memory llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/msan/msan_interceptors.cpp:1023:5
    #1  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:172:7
    #2  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Allocator.h:216:12
    #3  in Allocate llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:53:43
    #4  in Allocate<char> llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/AllocatorBase.h:76:29
    #5  in convertCodePointToUTF8 llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:42:30
    #6  in clang::comments::Lexer::resolveHTMLDecimalCharacterReference(llvm::StringRef) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:76:10
    #7  in clang::comments::Lexer::lexHTMLCharacterReference(clang::comments::Token&) llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentLexer.cpp:615:16
    #8  in consumeToken llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/CommentParser.h:62:9
    #9  in clang::comments::Parser::parseParagraphOrBlockCommand() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp
    #10 in clang::comments::Parser::parseFullComment() llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/CommentParser.cpp:925:22
    #11 in clang::RawComment::parse(clang::ASTContext const&, clang::Preprocessor const*, clang::Decl const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RawCommentList.cpp:221:12
    #12 in clang::ASTContext::getCommentForDecl(clang::Decl const*, clang::Preprocessor const*) const llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp:714:35
    #13 in clang_Cursor_getParsedComment llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXComment.cpp:36:35
    #14 in PrintCursorComments llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:756:25
 ```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
Reverts llvm#125020


https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/24/builds/5252/steps/12/logs/stdio

```
==c-index-test==2512295==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0xe19338c27992 at pc 0xc66be4784830 bp 0xe0e33660df00 sp 0xe0e33660d6e8
READ of size 23 at 0xe19338c27992 thread T1
    #0 0xc66be478482c in printf_common(void*, char const*, std::__va_list) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors_format.inc:563:9
    #1 0xc66be478643c in vprintf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1699:1
    #2 0xc66be478643c in printf /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:1757:1
    #3 0xc66be4839384 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1359:5
    #4 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11
    #5 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp
    
0xe19338c27992 is located 82 bytes inside of 105-byte region [0xe19338c27940,0xe19338c279a9)
freed by thread T1 here:
    #0 0xc66be480040c in free /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:51:3
    #1 0xc66be4839728 in GetCursorSource c-index-test.c
    #2 0xc66be4839368 in FilteredPrintingVisitor /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c:1360:12
    #3 0xe4e3454f12e8 in clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::Visit(CXCursor, bool) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp:227:11
    #4 0xe4e3454f48a8 in bool clang::cxcursor::CursorVisitor::visitPreprocessedEntities<clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator>(clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord::iterator, clang::PreprocessingRecord&, clang::FileID) CIndex.cpp


previously allocated by thread T1 here:
    #0 0xc66be4800680 in malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67:3
    #1 0xe4e3456379b0 in safe_malloc /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/MemAlloc.h:26:18
    #2 0xe4e3456379b0 in createDup /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:95:40
    #3 0xe4e3456379b0 in clang::cxstring::createRef(llvm::StringRef) /home/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux-bootstrap-asan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/libclang/CXString.cpp:90:10
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
…127087)

Fixes the following crash in clang-repl

```c++
clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '('
    1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
      |                       ^
      |                       (
clang-repl: /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1757: void clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*): Assertion `D->getLexicalDeclContext() == this && "Decl inserted into wrong lexical context"' failed.
 #0 0x000059b28459e6da llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:804:22
 #1 0x000059b28459eaed PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:880:1
 #2 0x000059b28459bf7f llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:20
 #3 0x000059b28459df8e SignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:418:13
 #4 0x000077cdf444ea50 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42a50)
 #5 0x000077cdf44aee3b pthread_kill (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0xa2e3b)
 #6 0x000077cdf444e928 raise (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x42928)
 #7 0x000077cdf443156c abort (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2556c)
 #8 0x000077cdf44314d2 __assert_perror_fail (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x254d2)
 #9 0x000077cdf4444c56 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x38c56)
#10 0x000059b28495bfc4 clang::DeclContext::addHiddenDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1759:3
#11 0x000059b28495c0f5 clang::DeclContext::addDecl(clang::Decl*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:1785:37
#12 0x000059b28773cc2a clang::Sema::ActOnStartTopLevelStmtDecl(clang::Scope*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:20302:18
#13 0x000059b286f1efdf clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelStmtDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:6024:62
#14 0x000059b286ef18ee clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsedAttributes&, clang::ParsingDeclSpec*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:1065:35
#15 0x000059b286ef0702 clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&, clang::Sema::ModuleImportState&) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp:758:36
#16 0x000059b28562dff2 clang::IncrementalParser::ParseOrWrapTopLevelDecl() /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:66:36
#17 0x000059b28562e5b7 clang::IncrementalParser::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/IncrementalParser.cpp:132:8
#18 0x000059b28561832b clang::Interpreter::Parse(llvm::StringRef) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:570:8
#19 0x000059b285618cbd clang::Interpreter::ParseAndExecute(llvm::StringRef, clang::Value*) /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/lib/Interpreter/Interpreter.cpp:649:8
#20 0x000059b2836f9343 main /home/vipul-cariappa/Documents/Workspace/cpp-py/llvms/llvm-project-a/clang/tools/clang-repl/ClangRepl.cpp:255:59
#21 0x000077cdf443388e (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2788e)
#22 0x000077cdf443394a __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x2794a)
#23 0x000059b2836f7965 _start (./bin/clang-repl+0x73b8965)
fish: Job 1, './bin/clang-repl' terminated by signal SIGABRT (Abort)
```

With this change:
```c++
clang-repl> try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_1:1:23: error: expected '('
    1 | try { throw 1; } catch { 0; }
      |                       ^
      |                       (
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> 1;
clang-repl> %quit
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2025
For function declarations (i.e. func op has no entry block), the
FunctionOpInterface method `insertArgument` and `eraseArgument` will
cause segfault. This PR guards against manipulation of empty entry block
by checking whether func op is external.

An example can be seen in google/heir#1324

The segfault trace

```
 #1 0x0000560f1289d9db PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:874:1
 #2 0x0000560f1289b116 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:105:5
 #3 0x0000560f1289e145 SignalHandler(int) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:415:1
 #4 0x00007f829a3d9520 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x42520)
 #5 0x0000560f1257f8bc void __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:162:23
 #6 0x0000560f1257f84d void std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::construct<mlir::BlockArgument, mlir::BlockArgument>(std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument>&, mlir::BlockArgument*, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:520:2
 #7 0x0000560f12580498 void std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::_M_insert_aux<mlir::BlockArgument>(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument&&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:405:7
 #8 0x0000560f1257cf7e std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> >::insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<mlir::BlockArgument const*, std::vector<mlir::BlockArgument, std::allocator<mlir::BlockArgument> > >, mlir::BlockArgument const&) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/vector.tcc:154:6
 #9 0x0000560f1257b349 mlir::Block::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/IR/Block.cpp:178:13
#10 0x0000560f123d2a1c mlir::function_interface_impl::insertFunctionArguments(mlir::FunctionOpInterface, llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>, unsigned int, mlir::Type) /proc/self/cwd/external/llvm-project/mlir/lib/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.cpp:232:11
#11 0x0000560f0be6b727 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArguments(llvm::ArrayRef<unsigned int>, mlir::TypeRange, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::DictionaryAttr>, llvm::ArrayRef<mlir::Location>) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:809:7
#12 0x0000560f0be6b536 mlir::detail::FunctionOpInterfaceTrait<mlir::func::FuncOp>::insertArgument(unsigned int, mlir::Type, mlir::DictionaryAttr, mlir::Location) /proc/self/cwd/bazel-out/k8-dbg/bin/external/llvm-project/mlir/include/mlir/Interfaces/FunctionInterfaces.h.inc:796:7
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2025
When compiling VLS SVE, the compiler often replaces VL-based offsets
with immediate-based ones. This leads to a mismatch in the allowed
addressing modes due to SVE loads/stores generally expecting immediate
offsets relative to VL. For example, given:
```c

svfloat64_t foo(const double *x) {
  svbool_t pg = svptrue_b64();
  return svld1_f64(pg, x+svcntd());
}
```

When compiled with `-msve-vector-bits=128`, we currently generate:
```gas
foo:
        ptrue   p0.d
        mov     x8, #2
        ld1d    { z0.d }, p0/z, [x0, x8, lsl #3]
        ret
```

Instead, we could be generating:
```gas
foo:
        ldr     z0, [x0, #1, mul vl]
        ret
```

Likewise for other types, stores, and other VLS lengths.

This patch achieves the above by extending `SelectAddrModeIndexedSVE`
to let constants through when `vscale` is known.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2025
…1027)

No codegen regression on either target. The two builtin_ffs implied on
nvptx CSE away.

```
define internal i64 @__gpu_read_first_lane_u64(i64 noundef %__lane_mask, i64 noundef %__x) #2 {
entry:
  %shr = lshr i64 %__x, 32
  %conv = trunc nuw i64 %shr to i32
  %conv1 = trunc i64 %__x to i32
  %conv2 = trunc i64 %__lane_mask to i32
  %0 = tail call range(i32 0, 33) i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %conv2, i1 true)
  %iszero = icmp eq i32 %conv2, 0
  %sub = select i1 %iszero, i32 -1, i32 %0
  %1 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv2, i32 %conv, i32 %sub, i32 31)
  %conv4 = sext i32 %1 to i64
  %shl = shl nsw i64 %conv4, 32
  %2 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv2, i32 %conv1, i32 %sub, i32 31)
  %conv7 = zext i32 %2 to i64
  %or = or disjoint i64 %shl, %conv7
  ret i64 %or
}
; becomes

define internal i64 @__gpu_competing_read_first_lane_u64(i64 noundef %__lane_mask, i64 noundef %__x) #2 {
entry:
  %shr = lshr i64 %__x, 32
  %conv = trunc nuw i64 %shr to i32
  %conv1 = trunc i64 %__x to i32
  %conv.i = trunc i64 %__lane_mask to i32
  %0 = tail call range(i32 0, 33) i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %conv.i, i1 true)
  %iszero = icmp eq i32 %conv.i, 0
  %sub.i = select i1 %iszero, i32 -1, i32 %0
  %1 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv.i, i32 %conv, i32 %sub.i, i32 31)
  %conv4 = zext i32 %1 to i64
  %shl = shl nuw i64 %conv4, 32
  %2 = tail call i32 @llvm.nvvm.shfl.sync.idx.i32(i32 %conv.i, i32 %conv1, i32 %sub.i, i32 31)
  %conv7 = zext i32 %2 to i64
  %or = or disjoint i64 %shl, %conv7
  ret i64 %or
}
```

The sext vs zext difference is vaguely interesting but since the bits
are immediately discarded in either case it make no odds. The amdgcn one
doesn't need CSE, the readfirstlane function is a single call to an
intrinsic.

Drive by fix to __gpu_match_all_u32, it was calling first_lane_u64 and
could use first_lane_u32 instead. Added the missing call to gpuintrin.c
test case and a stray missing static as well.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
…too. (llvm#132267)

Observed in Wine when trying to intercept `ExitThread`, which forwards
to `ntdll.RtlExitUserThread`.

`gdb` interprets it as `xchg %ax,%ax`.
`llvm-mc` outputs simply `nop`.

```
==Asan-i386-calls-Dynamic-Test.exe==964==interception_win: unhandled instruction at 0x7be27cf0: 66 90 55 89 e5 56 50 8b
```

```
Wine-gdb> bt
#0  0x789a1766 in __interception::GetInstructionSize (address=<optimized out>, rel_offset=<optimized out>) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:983
#1  0x789ab480 in __sanitizer::SharedPrintfCode(bool, char const*, char*) () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_printf.cpp:311
#2  0x789a18e7 in __interception::OverrideFunctionWithHotPatch (old_func=2078440688, new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1118
#3  0x789a1f34 in __interception::OverrideFunction (old_func=2078440688, new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1224
#4  0x789a24ce in __interception::OverrideFunction (func_name=0x78a0bc43 <vtable for __asan::AsanThreadContext+1163> "ExitThread", new_func=2023702608, orig_old_func=warning: (Internal error: pc 0x792f1a2c in read in CU, but not in symtab.)warning: (Error: pc 0x792f1a2c in address map, but not in symtab.)0x792f1a2c)    at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/interception/interception_win.cpp:1369
#5  0x789f40ef in __asan::InitializePlatformInterceptors () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_win.cpp:190
#6  0x789e0c3c in __asan::InitializeAsanInterceptors () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:802
#7  0x789ee6b5 in __asan::AsanInitInternal () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:442
#8  0x789eefb0 in __asan::AsanInitFromRtl () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:522
#9  __asan::AsanInitializer::AsanInitializer (this=<optimized out>) at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:542
#10 __cxx_global_var_init () at C:/llvm-mingw/llvm-mingw/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_rtl.cpp:546
...
Wine-gdb> disassemble /r 2078440688,2078440688+20
Dump of assembler code from 0x7be27cf0 to 0x7be27d04:
   0x7be27cf0 <_RtlExitUserThread@4+0>: 66 90                   xchg   %ax,%ax
...
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2025
Conflicts:
	clang/lib/CodeGen/CGPointerAuth.cpp
  clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp

Attempt #2. I originally resolved this in
6c7bb7f but for some unknown reason the
automerger didn't pick the change up.

rdar://147536848
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
…#134130)

This should fix failures caused by
llvm#133967
Attn: @sarnex
Thanks

Signed-off-by: Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam@intel.com>
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
…d A520 (llvm#132246)

Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores,
those being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector
add

```
void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) {
    for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
        dst[i] = a[i] + b[i];
}
```

Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence
of instructions.

```
        add     x12, x1, x10
        ld1b    { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10]
        add     x13, x2, x10
        ld1b    { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10]
        ldr     z2, [x12, #1, mul vl]
        ldr     z3, [x13, #1, mul vl]
        dech    x11
        add     x12, x0, x10
        fadd    z0.s, z1.s, z0.s
        fadd    z1.s, z3.s, z2.s
        st1b    { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10]
        addvl   x10, x10, #2
        str     z1, [x12, #1, mul vl]
```

By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the
cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop.

```
         ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16]
         subs    x13, x13, #8
         ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16]
         add x10, x10, #32
         add x11, x11, #32
         fadd    v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
         fadd    v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s
         stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16]
         add x12, x12, #32
```

Which is more efficient.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
… A510/A520 (llvm#134606)

Recommit. This work was done by llvm#132246 but failed buildbots due to the
test introduced needing updates

Inefficient SVE codegen occurs on at least two in-order cores, those
being Cortex-A510 and Cortex-A520. For example a simple vector add

```
void foo(float a, float b, float dst, unsigned n) {
    for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
        dst[i] = a[i] + b[i];
}
```

Vectorizes the inner loop into the following interleaved sequence of
instructions.

```
        add     x12, x1, x10
        ld1b    { z0.b }, p0/z, [x1, x10]
        add     x13, x2, x10
        ld1b    { z1.b }, p0/z, [x2, x10]
        ldr     z2, [x12, #1, mul vl]
        ldr     z3, [x13, #1, mul vl]
        dech    x11
        add     x12, x0, x10
        fadd    z0.s, z1.s, z0.s
        fadd    z1.s, z3.s, z2.s
        st1b    { z0.b }, p0, [x0, x10]
        addvl   x10, x10, #2
        str     z1, [x12, #1, mul vl]
```

By adjusting the target features to prefer fixed over scalable if the
cost is equal we get the following vectorized loop.

```
         ldp q0, q3, [x11, #-16]
         subs    x13, x13, #8
         ldp q1, q2, [x10, #-16]
         add x10, x10, #32
         add x11, x11, #32
         fadd    v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
         fadd    v1.4s, v2.4s, v3.4s
         stp q0, q1, [x12, #-16]
         add x12, x12, #32
```

Which is more efficient.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2025
…ctor-bits=128." (llvm#134997)

Reverts llvm#134068

Caused a stage 2 build failure:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/6016

```
FAILED: lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o 
/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG  -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp
Opcode has unknown scale!
UNREACHABLE executed at ../llvm/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.cpp:4530!
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0.	Program arguments: /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang++ -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage2/include -I/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/include -mcpu=neoverse-512tvb -mllvm -scalable-vectorization=preferred -mllvm -treat-scalable-fixed-error-as-warning=false -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wc++98-compat-extra-semi -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wsuggest-override -Wno-comment -Wstring-conversion -Wmisleading-indentation -Wctad-maybe-unsupported -fdiagnostics-color -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Werror=global-constructors -O3 -DNDEBUG -std=c++17 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions -funwind-tables -fno-rtti -MD -MT lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -MF lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o.d -o lib/Support/CMakeFiles/LLVMSupport.dir/Caching.cpp.o -c /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp
1.	<eof> parser at end of file
2.	Code generation
3.	Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Caching.cpp'.
4.	Running pass 'AArch64 load / store optimization pass' on function '@"_ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFN4llvm8ExpectedISt8functionIFNS1_ISt10unique_ptrINS0_16CachedFileStreamESt14default_deleteIS4_EEEEjRKNS0_5TwineEEEEEjNS0_9StringRefESB_EZNS0_10localCacheESB_SB_SB_S2_IFvjSB_S3_INS0_12MemoryBufferES5_ISH_EEEEE3$_0E9_M_invokeERKSt9_Any_dataOjOSF_SB_"'
 #0 0x0000b6eae9b67bf0 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c7bf0)
 #1 0x0000b6eae9b65aec llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x81c5aec)
 #2 0x0000b6eae9acd5f4 CrashRecoverySignalHandler(int) CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:0:0
 #3 0x0000f16c1aff28f8 (linux-vdso.so.1+0x8f8)
 #4 0x0000f16c1aacf1f0 __pthread_kill_implementation ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44:76
 #5 0x0000f16c1aa8a67c gsignal ./signal/../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:27:6
 #6 0x0000f16c1aa77130 abort ./stdlib/abort.c:81:7
 #7 0x0000b6eae9ad6628 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x8136628)
 #8 0x0000b6eae72e95a8 (/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage/stage1.install/bin/clang+++0x59495a8)
 #9 0x0000b6eae74ca9a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::findMatchingInsn(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>, (anonymous namespace)::LdStPairFlags&, unsigned int, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
#10 0x0000b6eae74c85a8 (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::tryToPairLdStInst(llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr, false>&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
#11 0x0000b6eae74c624c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::optimizeBlock(llvm::MachineBasicBlock&, bool) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
#12 0x0000b6eae74c429c (anonymous namespace)::AArch64LoadStoreOpt::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer.cpp:0:0
```
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2025
…vailable (llvm#135343)

When a frame is inlined, LLDB will display its name in backtraces as
follows:
```
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.3
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] baz(x=10) at inline.cpp:1:42
    frame #1: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() [inlined] bar() at inline.cpp:2:37
    frame #2: 0x0000000100000398 a.out`func() at inline.cpp:4:15
    frame #3: 0x00000001000003c0 a.out`main at inline.cpp:7:5
    frame #4: 0x000000026eb29ab8 dyld`start + 6812
```
The longer the names get the more confusing this gets because the first
function name that appears is the parent frame. My assumption (which may
need some more surveying) is that for the majority of cases we only care
about the actual frame name (not the parent). So this patch removes all
the special logic that prints the parent frame.

Another quirk of the current format is that the inlined frame name does
not abide by the `${function.name-XXX}` format variables. We always just
print the raw demangled name. With this patch, we would format the
inlined frame name according to the `frame-format` setting (see the
test-cases).

If we really want to have the `parentFrame [inlined] inlinedFrame`
format, we could expose it through a new `frame-format` variable (e..g.,
`${function.inlined-at-name}` and let the user decide where to place
things.
swift-ci pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
The linter messed up the order of includes, which is necessary as is.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants