Skip to content

Disable eager start by default #1879

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged

Conversation

Quinn-With-Two-Ns
Copy link
Contributor

Disable eager start by default because it does not interact with worker versioning well.

@Quinn-With-Two-Ns Quinn-With-Two-Ns marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2023 18:00
@Quinn-With-Two-Ns Quinn-With-Two-Ns requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2023 18:00
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ public static final class Builder {

private List<ContextPropagator> contextPropagators;

private boolean disableEagerExecution;
private boolean disableEagerExecution = true;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we were to do it over again, I suspect we'd prefer enableEagerExecution here and I suspect that's what it'll be in all other SDKs. Is it worth breaking compatibility to make it more clearly opt-in? If we are willing to change it, I wonder if enableEagerStart is a better name to match Go.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree if we were doing it from scratch I would change the name, but we aren't doing it from scratch and we need to keep in mind of compatibility guarantees so I wouldn't change the name since it's more trouble then it's worth

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 I think at least for any other SDKs we implement this in, we can be more Go like and just let Java be the outlier

@Quinn-With-Two-Ns Quinn-With-Two-Ns merged commit b083a70 into temporalio:master Oct 5, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants