Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Fix layers_normalizations.ipynb typos #2606

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2021
Merged

Conversation

inyong37
Copy link
Contributor

@inyong37 inyong37 commented Nov 15, 2021

Description

Brief Description of the PR: fix typos: "neual" -> "neural", and "independt" -> "independently".

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Checklist:

  • I've properly formatted my code according to the guidelines
    • By running Black + Flake8
    • By running pre-commit hooks
  • This PR addresses an already submitted issue for TensorFlow Addons
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • This PR contains modifications to C++ custom-ops

How Has This Been Tested?

If you're adding a bugfix or new feature please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes:
*

- typo "neual" -> "neural"
@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

- typo "independt" -> "independently"
@inyong37 inyong37 changed the title Update layers_normalizations.ipynb with typo "neual" -> "neural" Fix layers_normalizations.ipynb typos Nov 15, 2021
@inyong37
Copy link
Contributor Author

@googlebot I fixed it.

@google-cla google-cla bot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Nov 16, 2021
@inyong37 inyong37 marked this pull request as draft November 16, 2021 05:06
@inyong37 inyong37 marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2021 05:07
@bhack bhack merged commit a4113f6 into tensorflow:master Nov 16, 2021
@bhack
Copy link
Contributor

bhack commented Nov 16, 2021

Thanks

@inyong37
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bhack Thanks for review and merge :)

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants