Skip to content

fix: server.attached_sessions #537

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2024

Conversation

patrislav1
Copy link
Contributor

The current implementation of server.attached_sessions excludes sessions that have more than one client attached.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 18, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@tony tony self-requested a review March 23, 2024 15:34
@tony
Copy link
Member

tony commented Mar 23, 2024

A very good catch.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.75%. Comparing base (c4f6426) to head (94aceaa).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #537   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.75%   88.75%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        3965     3965           
  Branches      574      575    +1     
=======================================
  Hits         3519     3519           
  Misses        304      304           
  Partials      142      142           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tony tony merged commit 45cce80 into tmux-python:master Mar 23, 2024
Copy link
Member

@tony tony left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

tony added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
@tony
Copy link
Member

tony commented Mar 23, 2024

@patrislav1 If you try 0.35.1 (changes, release, PyPI), any better?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants