Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add bcrypt hashing for password #8

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024
Merged

Add bcrypt hashing for password #8

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2024

Conversation

megoxv
Copy link
Member

@megoxv megoxv commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced password handling with state dehydration, ensuring passwords are hashed before storage.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the Password class in the Filament resource, specifically enhancing the password handling mechanism. The change focuses on adding a state dehydration method that automatically applies bcrypt hashing to the password before storage, improving the security of password management within the application.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/Filament/Resources/AccountResource/Form/Components/Password.php Added dehydrateStateUsing method to apply bcrypt hashing during state dehydration

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Password Tale 🔐

With bcrypt's magic, passwords now dance,
Hashed and secured with a cryptic glance,
No plain text lurking, no secrets bare,
Our code now whispers with digital flair!
Security leaps with each rabbit's care 🛡️


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Filament/Resources/AccountResource/Form/Components/Password.php (2)

16-16: Consider adding password update specific handling

The current implementation might benefit from separating password creation from password update logic.

Consider implementing a separate method for password updates:

public static function makeForUpdate(): Forms\Components\Field
{
    return static::make()
        ->dehydrated(fn ($state) => filled($state))  // Only process if password is being changed
        ->required(false)
        ->minLength(8)
        ->rules(['confirmed']);
}

16-16: Consider configuring bcrypt cost factor

While Laravel's default bcrypt cost of 10 is generally good, you might want to explicitly configure it based on your server capabilities.

You can customize the cost factor in your .env file:

BCRYPT_ROUNDS=12

This allows you to adjust the computational cost based on your server's performance characteristics while maintaining security.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f544b93 and e385637.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Filament/Resources/AccountResource/Form/Components/Password.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/Filament/Resources/AccountResource/Form/Components/Password.php (1)

16-16: Verify the component usage across the codebase

Let's ensure this component is properly integrated with account creation and update flows.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response:

Password handling is properly integrated across account flows

The password component is correctly integrated within the account management system:

  • Password encryption is consistently handled using bcrypt across all entry points:
    • Account creation (CreateAccount.php)
    • Account editing (EditAccount.php)
    • Password change action (ChangePasswordAction.php)
    • Form component (Password.php)
  • Password confirmation is properly implemented with matching components
  • Password fields are only visible when login is enabled (is_login check)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how this Password component is used in account-related forms

# Find account-related form configurations
rg -l "AccountResource" --type php

# Check for password handling in account controllers
rg -A 5 "password" --type php

Length of output: 29387

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ public static function make(): Forms\Components\Field
->confirmed()
->visible(fn (Forms\Get $get) => $get('is_login'))
->password()
->dehydrateStateUsing(fn ($state) => bcrypt($state))
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Prevent potential double-hashing of passwords

The current implementation has several security concerns:

  1. It will hash an already hashed password if the form is resubmitted
  2. It doesn't handle null/empty password states
  3. It might double-hash existing passwords during updates

Apply this diff to fix these issues:

-            ->dehydrateStateUsing(fn ($state) => bcrypt($state))
+            ->dehydrateStateUsing(function ($state) {
+                if (empty($state)) {
+                    return $state;
+                }
+                // Only hash if the password is modified/new
+                if (strlen($state) < 60 || !password_get_info($state)['algo']) {
+                    return bcrypt($state);
+                }
+                return $state;
+            })
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
->dehydrateStateUsing(fn ($state) => bcrypt($state))
->dehydrateStateUsing(function ($state) {
if (empty($state)) {
return $state;
}
// Only hash if the password is modified/new
if (strlen($state) < 60 || !password_get_info($state)['algo']) {
return bcrypt($state);
}
return $state;
})

@3x1io 3x1io merged commit 1f5cabf into tomatophp:master Dec 22, 2024
1 check passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants