Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add proof of inconsistency for a Validated Monad #4255

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 1, 2022
Merged

Add proof of inconsistency for a Validated Monad #4255

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 1, 2022

Conversation

TonioGela
Copy link
Member

Closes #4251.

@armanbilge armanbilge changed the title Add inconsistency proof for a Validated Monad in Documentation Add proof of inconsistency for a Validated Monad Jun 25, 2022
Copy link
Member

@armanbilge armanbilge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks really good! Nice work. Just some bikeshedding and nitpicking :)

armanbilge
armanbilge previously approved these changes Jun 26, 2022
Copy link
Member

@armanbilge armanbilge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, great addition!

@armanbilge armanbilge merged commit cf8a87a into typelevel:main Jul 1, 2022
@TonioGela TonioGela deleted the lawful_doc_update_4251 branch July 2, 2022 07:20
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use laws to explain why there is no e.g. Monad[Validated]
2 participants