Tag, ITagRepository & Tag property type improvements #15840
Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
@drummerboy46 thanks for your input! I am completely clueless on the technical side, my team will get back to you shortly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@drummerboy46 just a reply (not an "official HQ reply") from skimming your suggestion: I believe the Contentment package probably covers your needs at the moment, I would specifically check out the Data List editor -https://github.com/leekelleher/umbraco-contentment / https://github.com/leekelleher/umbraco-contentment/blob/develop/docs/editors/data-list.md |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Oh, haha. I though it was for our Tag Manager package..
Korte afspraak inplannen? Gebruik deze link naar mijn agenda!<https://calendly.com/zaaks/>
Melvin van Rookhuizen
https://nl.linkedin.com/in/melvinvanrookhuizen
06-15909546
[1479189872460_handtekening]
Maliebaan 24-26
3581CB Utrecht
www.zaaks.nl<http://www.zaaks.nl>
030-2769146
…________________________________
Van: Sebastiaan Janssen ***@***.***>
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 maart 2024 14:44
Aan: umbraco/Umbraco-CMS ***@***.***>
CC: Melvin van Rookhuizen ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Onderwerp: Re: [umbraco/Umbraco-CMS] Tag, ITagRepository & Tag property type improvements (Discussion #15840)
Not sure what your team needs to do @melvinvanrookhuizen<https://github.com/melvinvanrookhuizen> - this was feedback for Umbraco HQ! 😉
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#15840 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKBPTFVQG5QVS523SK5BHTYWXD2RAVCNFSM6AAAAABEHAJ22CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DMOBQGUYTO>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Taxonomy tagging is a really important part of Umbraco and for content management in general, but I feel Tag implementation in Umbraco vs using pre-defined content nodes and a MNTP is lacking. The problem for content editors, is you cannot expect them to remember taxonomy naming and Umbraco tag functionality requires them to essentially "make" tags up (even the same tags) as they create new content, This is a problem for cross content relationships if choosing to use the Tag datatype.
Here's some thoughts...
Again apologies if i've missed APIs for this, but I couldn't find anything in the source or docs.
I've been slowly improving this https://github.com/usome/UmbracoTagManager usome/huws TagManager mostly to the underlying management code, but a lack methods in ITagRepository makes database access the only way to achieve the Manager.
I've also created a TagList DataType that reads all tags assigned to a group and lets you pick them. The tags are indexed in internal/external indexes as comma delimited strings and stored by default in the property as Json.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions