-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
fix(core): fix uni-page.d.ts #142
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update involves adjustments to the TypeScript declarations related to navigation options within a specific project. Specifically, the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
interface NavigateToOptions { | ||
url: ${allPagesPath.join(' |\n ')}; | ||
} | ||
interface RedirectToOptions extends NavigateToOptions {} | ||
|
||
export interface SwitchTabOptions { | ||
interface SwitchTabOptions { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The search results confirm that NavigateToOptions
and SwitchTabOptions
are indeed used across different parts of the project, including in packages/playground/src/uni-pages.d.ts
. This supports the concern that removing the export
keyword from these interfaces could impact other parts of the codebase that rely on them. It's crucial to ensure compatibility or update dependent code accordingly to avoid potential issues.
Analysis chain
The removal of the export
keyword from NavigateToOptions
and SwitchTabOptions
directly addresses the issue described in #140. However, this change might impact other parts of the codebase that rely on these interfaces being exported. It's crucial to ensure that no other modules import these interfaces. If they do, this change could break those imports, leading to potential issues in the project.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports of NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions in the project.
rg --type ts 'from ".*declaration"' | grep -E '(NavigateToOptions|SwitchTabOptions)'
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any usage of NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions in TypeScript files.
rg --type ts '(NavigateToOptions|SwitchTabOptions)'
Length of output: 1157
// @ts-nocheck | ||
// Generated by vite-plugin-uni-pages | ||
|
||
export interface NavigateToOptions { | ||
interface NavigateToOptions { | ||
url: ${allPagesPath.join(' |\n ')}; | ||
} | ||
interface RedirectToOptions extends NavigateToOptions {} | ||
|
||
export interface SwitchTabOptions { | ||
interface SwitchTabOptions { | ||
${tabsPagesPath.length ? `url: ${tabsPagesPath.join(' | ')}` : ''} | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-34]
Overall, the file's logic and structure appear sound, with clear responsibilities for each function. However, there are a few areas for potential improvement:
-
Error Handling in
writeFile
andwriteDeclaration
Functions: Both functions involve file operations that could fail, but there's no explicit error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks around these operations to handle potential errors gracefully. -
Code Duplication in URL Generation: The code for generating URLs in
getDeclaration
is somewhat repetitive, especially in the construction ofallPagesPath
. Consider refactoring this part to reduce duplication and improve maintainability. -
Use of
ts-nocheck
: The generated code includes a// @ts-nocheck
comment, which disables TypeScript checks for the entire file. This might be necessary given the dynamic nature of the generated code, but it's worth reviewing whether there's a more targeted way to handle any TypeScript issues without disabling checks for the entire file.
async function writeFile(filePath: string, content: string) {
+ try {
await mkdir(dirname(filePath), { recursive: true })
return await writeFile_(filePath, content, 'utf-8')
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error(`Failed to write file at ${filePath}`, error);
+ }
}
export async function writeDeclaration(ctx: PageContext, filepath: string) {
const originalContent = existsSync(filepath) ? await readFile(filepath, 'utf-8') : ''
const code = getDeclaration(ctx)
if (!code)
return
+ try {
if (code !== originalContent)
await writeFile(filepath, code)
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error(`Failed to update declaration file at ${filepath}`, error);
+ }
}
Fixes #140
Description 描述
Linked Issues 关联的 Issues
Additional context 额外上下文
Summary by CodeRabbit