Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix(core): fix uni-page.d.ts #142

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

fix(core): fix uni-page.d.ts #142

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

KeJunMao
Copy link
Member

@KeJunMao KeJunMao commented Mar 5, 2024

Fixes #140

Description 描述

Linked Issues 关联的 Issues

Additional context 额外上下文

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Modified internal navigation options to enhance code maintainability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update involves adjustments to the TypeScript declarations related to navigation options within a specific project. Specifically, the export keyword has been removed from the NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions interfaces, which means these interfaces are no longer directly accessible for import by other modules. This change aims to address issues related to type hinting and the effectiveness of .d.ts files in the development environment.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/core/src/declaration.ts Removed export from NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions interfaces

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Bug Description: uni-page.d.ts not effective (#140)
Reproduction steps: Issue with type hinting during Uni routing (#140)
Context: Development environment issue with .d.ts file (#140)

Poem

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where types do roam,
A rabbit hopped, making .d.ts its home.
No longer exported, yet clearer the path,
For IntelliSense to guide, and lessen the wrath.

🌟📚
Through files and types, it danced with glee,
A tiny change, a leap for a better spree.
"Hooray!" it cheered, in the moonlight's embrace,
A hop, a skip, in the vast codebase.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f07d70 and f9ce04f.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/core/src/declaration.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +21 to +26
interface NavigateToOptions {
url: ${allPagesPath.join(' |\n ')};
}
interface RedirectToOptions extends NavigateToOptions {}

export interface SwitchTabOptions {
interface SwitchTabOptions {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The search results confirm that NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions are indeed used across different parts of the project, including in packages/playground/src/uni-pages.d.ts. This supports the concern that removing the export keyword from these interfaces could impact other parts of the codebase that rely on them. It's crucial to ensure compatibility or update dependent code accordingly to avoid potential issues.

Analysis chain

The removal of the export keyword from NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions directly addresses the issue described in #140. However, this change might impact other parts of the codebase that rely on these interfaces being exported. It's crucial to ensure that no other modules import these interfaces. If they do, this change could break those imports, leading to potential issues in the project.


Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports of NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions in the project.
rg --type ts 'from ".*declaration"' | grep -E '(NavigateToOptions|SwitchTabOptions)'

Length of output: 86



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to find any usage of NavigateToOptions and SwitchTabOptions in TypeScript files.
rg --type ts '(NavigateToOptions|SwitchTabOptions)'

Length of output: 1157

Comment on lines 18 to 29
// @ts-nocheck
// Generated by vite-plugin-uni-pages

export interface NavigateToOptions {
interface NavigateToOptions {
url: ${allPagesPath.join(' |\n ')};
}
interface RedirectToOptions extends NavigateToOptions {}

export interface SwitchTabOptions {
interface SwitchTabOptions {
${tabsPagesPath.length ? `url: ${tabsPagesPath.join(' | ')}` : ''}
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-34]

Overall, the file's logic and structure appear sound, with clear responsibilities for each function. However, there are a few areas for potential improvement:

  1. Error Handling in writeFile and writeDeclaration Functions: Both functions involve file operations that could fail, but there's no explicit error handling. Consider adding try-catch blocks around these operations to handle potential errors gracefully.

  2. Code Duplication in URL Generation: The code for generating URLs in getDeclaration is somewhat repetitive, especially in the construction of allPagesPath. Consider refactoring this part to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.

  3. Use of ts-nocheck: The generated code includes a // @ts-nocheck comment, which disables TypeScript checks for the entire file. This might be necessary given the dynamic nature of the generated code, but it's worth reviewing whether there's a more targeted way to handle any TypeScript issues without disabling checks for the entire file.

async function writeFile(filePath: string, content: string) {
+  try {
    await mkdir(dirname(filePath), { recursive: true })
    return await writeFile_(filePath, content, 'utf-8')
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error(`Failed to write file at ${filePath}`, error);
+  }
}

export async function writeDeclaration(ctx: PageContext, filepath: string) {
  const originalContent = existsSync(filepath) ? await readFile(filepath, 'utf-8') : ''
  const code = getDeclaration(ctx)
  if (!code)
    return

+  try {
    if (code !== originalContent)
      await writeFile(filepath, code)
+  } catch (error) {
+    console.error(`Failed to update declaration file at ${filepath}`, error);
+  }
}

@KeJunMao KeJunMao merged commit c82eb9e into main Mar 7, 2024
@KeJunMao KeJunMao deleted the KeJunMao/issue140 branch March 7, 2024 00:35
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

uni-page.d.ts不生效
1 participant