Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Use account address when giving CIP8 profile access #354

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 12, 2021
Merged

Conversation

isabellewei
Copy link
Contributor

Description

If the account address of the recipient is known, use that address to grant CIP8 profile access

Tested

not tested

@isabellewei isabellewei added the automerge Have PR merge automatically when checks pass label May 12, 2021
const walletToAccountAddress: WalletToAccountAddressType = yield select(
walletToAccountAddressSelector
)
const accountAddress = walletToAccountAddress[walletAddress] ?? walletAddress
Copy link
Member

@jeanregisser jeanregisser May 12, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add an endpoint to blockchain-api to do this walletAddress -> accountAddress lookup in case we don't have the mapping in walletToAccountAddress?
i.e. exposing what is done in the transaction feed to get it.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 23b4db9 into main May 12, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the isabellewei/CIPfix branch May 12, 2021 14:02
jeanregisser pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2021
### Description

If the account address of the recipient is known, use that address to grant CIP8 profile access


### Tested

not tested
@ValoraQA
Copy link

Hi @jeanregisser @isabellewei can you please let us know that we need to test anything here if yes can you please provide some information about this task so, it would be really helpful to us to verify.
Thanks!

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
automerge Have PR merge automatically when checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants