-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
chore: update colors of transaction feed and points history icons #6450
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6450 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 89.05% 89.05%
========================================
Files 730 730
Lines 31895 31890 -5
Branches 5792 6107 +315
========================================
- Hits 28405 28401 -4
+ Misses 3443 3292 -151
- Partials 47 197 +150
... and 68 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ exports[`SendConfirmation renders correctly 1`] = ` | |||
"justifyContent": "center", | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"backgroundColor": "hsl(0, 53%, 93%)", | |||
"backgroundColor": "#F8F9F9", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file was removed with the new Review screen changes so this will probably become unnecessary after merging the main
in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh yeah sorry, i didn't realise there were conflicts! should have resolved them before i nagged for reviews 🙈
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
So we are getting rid of different icon colors depending on contact addresses?
yes correct - the reasoning is to keep the icons more muted and consistent, since the network icons are colorful already and this would draw more attention to them |
Description
This is planned for the transaction feed work but it also affects beefy, so I thought I'd just do it now. Kayla confirmed she is confident that she wants to go through with these changes (they're also in the demo designs) - rationale being taking away some color will bring more emphasis to the network icons.
Test plan
Related issues
Backwards compatibility
Y
Network scalability
If a new NetworkId and/or Network are added in the future, the changes in this PR will: