Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

chore: update questions.json #693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

chore: update questions.json #693

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

eltociear
Copy link
Contributor

fucntion -> function

fucntion -> function
Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: The PR aims to correct a typographical error in the questions.json file, ensuring the readability and accuracy of training data, which is critical for accurate Text-to-SQL generation.
  • Key components modified: The training_data/similarweb/questions.json file.
  • Impact assessment: The change improves data accuracy and readability without introducing any new functionality or dependencies.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: None. The change is isolated to a single file and does not affect system dependencies or integration points.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: None. The change is a simple correction in a JSON file and does not affect the system architecture.
  • Component interactions: None. The change does not alter how components interact within the system.
  • Integration points: None. The file is used for training data and does not impact integration points.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

Example 1: Correction in questions.json

  • File Path: training_data/similarweb/questions.json
    • Submitted PR Code:
      [
          {
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on Tesla and ford from 2018 to 2023 ? Convert varchar to date using to date fucntion , Plot a line chart ",
    
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on Tesla and ford from 2018 to 2023 ? Convert varchar to date using to date function , Plot a line chart ",
          "answer":"SELECT company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) as year, sum(total_visits) as total_visits FROM s__p_500_by_domain_and_aggregated_by_tickers_sample.datafeeds.sp_500 WHERE (company_name ilike '%Tesla%' or company_name = 'Ford') and to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') between '2018-01-01' and '2023-12-31' GROUP BY company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ORDER BY company_name, year;"
      },
      ...
    
    ]
    - **Analysis**:
    - **Current logic and potential issues**: The change corrects a typo from "fucntion" to "function." No functional issues are observed with this change.
    - **Edge cases and error handling**: None applicable for this change.
    - **Cross-component impact **: None.
    - **Business logic considerations **: None.
    - **LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements**: None required. The change is straightforward and corrects a typo.
    - **Improvement rationale **: None.
    
    

Example 2: Another Correction in questions.json

  • File Path: training_data/similarweb/questions.json
    • Submitted PR Code:
      [
          {
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on ebay and amazon from 2018 to 2021? Convert varchar to date using to date fucntion , Plot a line chart ",
    
  •      "question":"what are the year on year total visits on ebay and amazon from 2018 to 2021? Convert varchar to date using to date function , Plot a line chart ",
          "answer":"SELECT company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) as year, sum(total_visits) as total_visits FROM s__p_500_by_domain_and_aggregated_by_tickers_sample.datafeeds.sp_500 WHERE (company_name ilike '%ebay%' or company_name ilike '%amazon%') and to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') between '2018-01-01' and '2021-12-31' GROUP BY company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ORDER BY company_name, year;"
      },
      ...
    
    ]
    - **Analysis**:
    - **Current logic and potential issues**: Similar to the previous example, this change corrects a typo from "fucntion" to "function." No functional issues are observed with this change.
    - **Edge cases and error handling**: None applicable for this change.
    - **Cross-component impact **: None.
    - **Business logic considerations **: None.
    - **LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements**: None required. The change is straightforward and corrects a typo.
    - **Improvement rationale **: None.
    
    

Cross-cutting Concerns

  • Data flow analysis: Not applicable for this change.
  • State management implications: Not applicable for this change.
  • Error propagation paths: Not applicable for this change.
  • Edge case handling across components: Not applicable for this change.

Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis

  • Complexity analysis: Not applicable for this change.
  • Performance implications: Not applicable for this change.
  • Memory usage considerations: Not applicable for this change.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure: The questions.json file is well-organized, and the changes are isolated to the specific questions that needed correction.
  • Design patterns usage: Not applicable for JSON files.
  • Error handling approach: Not applicable for this change.
  • Resource management: Not applicable for this change.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues: None
  • 🟡 Warnings: None

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects: The corrections improve readability and maintainability by ensuring consistency in terminology.
  • Readability issues: None.
  • Performance bottlenecks: None applicable for this change.

4. Security Assessment

4.1 Security Considerations

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: Not applicable for this change.
  • Data handling concerns: Not applicable for this change.
  • Input validation: Not applicable for this change.
  • Security best practices: Not applicable for this change.

4.2 Vulnerability Analysis

  • Potential security risks: None.
  • Mitigation strategies: Not applicable for this change.
  • Security testing requirements: Not applicable for this change.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis: Not applicable for this change.
  • Integration test requirements: Not applicable for this change.
  • Edge cases coverage: Not applicable for this change.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

[
  {
    "question":"what are the year on year total visits on Tesla and ford from 2018 to 2023 ? Convert varchar to date using to date function , Plot a line chart ",
    "answer":"SELECT company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) as year, sum(total_visits) as total_visits FROM s__p_500_by_domain_and_aggregated_by_tickers_sample.datafeeds.sp_500 WHERE (company_name ilike '%Tesla%' or company_name = 'Ford') and to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD') between '2018-01-01' and '2023-12-31' GROUP BY company_name, extract(year FROM to_date(date, 'YYYY-MM-DD')) ORDER BY company_name, year;"
  },
  ...
]
  • Coverage improvements: Not applicable for this change.
  • Performance testing needs: Not applicable for this change.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed (API, architecture, configuration): None.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations: The correction improves maintainability by ensuring consistency in terminology.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements: None.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy: None. The change is isolated to a single file and does not affect deployment processes.
  • Key operational considerations: None. The change does not affect operational processes.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required: None
  2. Important improvements suggested: None
  3. Best practices to implement: None
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address: None

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path: Continue to monitor and correct any inconsistencies in training data to ensure accuracy.
  • Business capability evolution: Maintain high standards of data quality to support accurate Text-to-SQL generation.
  • System integration impacts: None. The change is isolated and does not affect system integration.

@zainhoda zainhoda merged commit cd29916 into vanna-ai:main Nov 21, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants