Fix NSX ALB service engine group & network validation failure when duplicate resource names in different clouds

[XudongLiuHarold]

Signed-off-by: Xudong Liu xudongl@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it

• When there are configured multiple clouds in NSX ALB controller, it is highly possible that customers use the same name for SEG in different clouds, this should be validate case, we should not throw errors about this.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes

Fixes #3603

Describe testing done for PR

• created vsphere mgmt cluster and verified the change

Release note

Users can now configure the NSX ALB controller with the same ALB resource name across multiple clouds.

Additional information

Special notes for your reviewer

[github-actions]

Cluster Generation A/B Results:
https://storage.googleapis.com/tkg-clustergen/3602/20221010094810/clustergen.diff.txt
Author/reviewers:
Please review to verify that the effects on the generated cluster configurations are exactly what the PR intended, and give a thumbs-up if so.

[github-actions]

Cluster Generation A/B Results:
https://storage.googleapis.com/tkg-clustergen/3602/20221010101405/clustergen.diff.txt
Author/reviewers:
Please review to verify that the effects on the generated cluster configurations are exactly what the PR intended, and give a thumbs-up if so.

[github-actions]

Cluster Generation A/B Results:
https://storage.googleapis.com/tkg-clustergen/3602/20221010102442/clustergen.diff.txt
Author/reviewers:
Please review to verify that the effects on the generated cluster configurations are exactly what the PR intended, and give a thumbs-up if so.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3602 (92851c1) into main (5f5ca70) will decrease coverage by 0.90%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 92851c1 differs from pull request most recent head b1dda1e. Consider uploading reports for the commit b1dda1e to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3602      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.22%   45.32%   -0.91%     
==========================================
  Files         400      425      +25     
  Lines       39624    41190    +1566     
==========================================
+ Hits        18317    18668     +351     
- Misses      19621    20811    +1190     
- Partials     1686     1711      +25     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
tkg/client/validate.go	58.49% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
addons/controllers/machine_controller.go	65.65% <0.00%> (-3.04%)	⬇️
addons/controllers/clusterbootstrap_controller.go	63.26% <0.00%> (-1.61%)	⬇️
...runtime/apis/config/v1alpha1/clientconfig_types.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/cli/plugin/cluster/get_machinehealthcheck.go	11.42% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/cli/plugin/cluster/delete_node_pool.go	16.66% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/cli/plugin/cluster/credentials_update.go	9.23% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/cli/plugin/cluster/machinehealthcheck.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/cli/plugin/cluster/main.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
cmd/cli/plugin/cluster/list.go	9.52% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 20 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[XudongLiuHarold]

/test install-vc7

[github-actions]

Cluster Generation A/B Results:
https://storage.googleapis.com/tkg-clustergen/3602/20221012024518/clustergen.diff.txt
Author/reviewers:
Please review to verify that the effects on the generated cluster configurations are exactly what the PR intended, and give a thumbs-up if so.

[github-actions]

Cluster Generation A/B Results:
https://storage.googleapis.com/tkg-clustergen/3602/20221017040016/clustergen.diff.txt
Author/reviewers:
Please review to verify that the effects on the generated cluster configurations are exactly what the PR intended, and give a thumbs-up if so.

[XudongLiuHarold]

/test install-vc7

[github-actions]

Cluster Generation A/B Results:
https://storage.googleapis.com/tkg-clustergen/3602/20221019091931/clustergen.diff.txt
Author/reviewers:
Please review to verify that the effects on the generated cluster configurations are exactly what the PR intended, and give a thumbs-up if so.

[alfredthenarwhal]

Build failed! Build no: 2948