Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Strip section 6.2.2.1 “wide review” of the mailing list currently mentioned #815

Closed
koalie opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Comments

@koalie
Copy link
Contributor

koalie commented Jan 10, 2024

Hello,

The Team (me, @swickr and @plehegar) has flagged that the Process Document refers to 1 (one) mailing list in an example.
It's in section 6.2.2.1. "wide review".

Instead of augmenting the process document with references to all the mailing lists that are used as part of executing the process document, we think it makes more sense to remove the example in parenthetical.

Performing such a change makes the Process and the way the Team implements it independent (which is desirable) and removes the possible perception that only one mailing list is used.

Thank you!

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Jan 11, 2024

I think a good way to do this sort of thigns is for the Team to document such things in /Guide, where you can mention the one or many mailing lists, or any other means we use, along with other relevant information about wide review, and have the Process refer to /Guide instead of having that parenthetical example.

I think that's already what https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/ does, so dropping the parenthetical example in favor of that seems fine to me.

@frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

frivoal commented Dec 6, 2024

See #952

@frivoal frivoal added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Dec 6, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process 2024/2025 milestone Dec 6, 2024
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels Dec 23, 2024
@frivoal frivoal closed this as completed Dec 23, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants