-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
WAI website update 2024-12-02 #313
Conversation
This reverts commit a75743a.
✅ Deploy Preview for wai-wcag-act-rules ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
This PR incorporates changes based on an update to the ACT-Tools framework, which contains significant changes. Happy to re-schedule this for 10 Dec when @remibetin is back. |
Thank you. My week just got more complicated with family medical issues. If it's not urgent, I prefer to wait for Rémi next week. |
* Update a1b64e Pass 2 to add role * Add a support note for issue 1909 regarding cycle to browser * Add a passing modal example * Fix spacing * Fix spacing --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Duarte <carlosapaduarte@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I defer to @daniel-montalvo on content and @remibetin for high-level QA. Thanks!
<li><a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#cc5">Learn more about WCAG Non-Interference</a></li> | ||
<li><strong>Required for conformance</strong> to WCAG 2.1.</li> | ||
<li><a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#cc5">Learn more about WCAG Non-Interference</a></li> | ||
<li><strong>Required for conformance</strong> to WCAG 2.2.</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daniel-montalvo Any reason not to use "Required for conformance to WCAG 2.0 and later"?
"Required for conformance to WCAG 2.x and later" is a widely used pattern in ACT Rules. Readers might interpret "Required for conformance to WCAG 2.2" in a restricted way (i.e. not required for conformance to WCAG 2.0 or 2.1)
[examples of accessible name]: https://act-rules.github.io/pages/examples/accessible-name/ | ||
[examples of included in the accessibility tree]: https://act-rules.github.io/pages/examples/included-in-the-accessibility-tree/ | ||
[flat tree]: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scoping/#flat-tree 'Definition of flat tree' | ||
[html aam image button]: https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aam-1.0/#input-type-image 'HTML Accessibility API Mapping, image button' | ||
[html aam]: https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aam-1.0/#html-attribute-state-and-property-mappings 'Specification of HTML attributes value mapping to ARIA states and properties' | ||
[idl attribute]: https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-attributes "Definition of Web IDL Attribute (Editor's Draft)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daniel-montalvo FYI, this link redirects to https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-attributes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@daniel-montalvo I have added a couple comments for your consideration. Not sure they are blockers though.
Thanks @remibetin for your comments and suggestions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving. I propose that we addressed received comments in later updates.
@daniel-montalvo Published. Please QA. |
This is an automated pull request to publish ACT content to the WAI website.