-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Consolidation on the usage of website. #3662
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we want/need to exclude all material inside the wcag20
folder in this PR
Yes, I was wondering about this. I would be happy to exclude previous versions of WCAG. |
Thanks for the changes Theo, think this is looking good now |
As a sidenote, we talked about a W3C Manual Of Style last Friday, and I think we said it wasn't a thing anymore. It looks like it does and was updated this month. |
Due to the high number of merge conflicts, suggest this (if we want to go ahead with it) be redone fresh |
Dicsssion from TF: We need to re-do this one, partly due to clashes, but partly due to the normative ones already being done. We need to keep the normative doc changes separate from the informative docs (understanding/techniques). |
@mbgower will make a new PR replciating his normative style changes to the non-normative documents. |
Discussed on backlog call 2/21. @mbgower volunteered to do the cleanup and separate out the corrections on TR docs from the WAI docs. |
I have created #4242 to replace this. |
Should this be closed if it's superseded by #4242 ? |
Closed as resolved by #4242 |
Per the discussion on 26/01/2024 in regards to the term website, we would like to consolidate on writing website.
Preview | Diff