Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Setting the codecov thresholds for the current code coverage #204

Merged

Conversation

giovannipizzi
Copy link
Member

To avoid unuseful "failed" tests in the codecov reports.

code coverage, to avoid unuseful "failed" tests
in the codecov reports.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #204 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #204   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    60.96%   60.96%           
========================================
  Files           29       29           
  Lines        16961    16961           
========================================
  Hits         10340    10340           
  Misses        6621     6621

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 92b1b18...a65933c. Read the comment docs.

@giovannipizzi giovannipizzi changed the title [DO NOT MERGE YET] Setting the codecov thresholds for the current code coverage Setting the codecov thresholds for the current code coverage Oct 5, 2018
@giovannipizzi giovannipizzi merged commit e3f43e9 into wannier-developers:develop Oct 5, 2018
@giovannipizzi giovannipizzi deleted the set_codecov_thresholds branch November 27, 2018 16:49
manxkim pushed a commit to manxkim/wannier90 that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2021
…cov_thresholds

Setting the codecov thresholds for the current code coverage
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants