Different top end clip for high cloud images

[betatim]

For images with a lot of clouds the ground is very dark. For example:

You could improve this by using a larger top end clip for scenes that have a lot of cloud.

As an example: the same image as above but by hand clipping a lot more at the top:

The clouds get clipped and you lose details there but you can see the ground.

To do: experiment with what a good clip value is. MGRS code for the example image: T47PNN_20190127T034021_rgb_small.jpg

cc @ozjtigger1

[Jeffery-Thompson]

Nice! that's a bit improvement Jeffery A. Thompson RIS HPC Geospatial Analyst Research Informatics Solutions Minnesota Supercomputing Institute jathomps@umn.edu

…

On Feb 11, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Tim Head ***@***.***> wrote: For images with a lot of clouds the ground is very dark. For example: <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1448859/52601029-da406400-2e5d-11e9-869a-3da46c06e763.jpg> You could improve this by using a larger top end clip for scenes that have a lot of cloud. As an example: the same image as above but by hand clipping a lot more at the top: <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1448859/52601133-11167a00-2e5e-11e9-944d-e87ae6693da5.jpg> The clouds get clipped and you lose details there but you can see the ground. To do: experiment with what a good clip value is. MGRS code for the example image: T47PNN_20190127T034021_rgb_small.jpg cc @ozjtigger1 <https://github.com/ozjtigger1> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#33>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATupluN02DpVPZcTKnyebs83oCZyANzgks5vMf6JgaJpZM4a1SGD>.