Draft: 931 feature add role based access control to running workflows

[eenblam]

Here's my first pass at adding auth for inputstep per #931.

I'd appreciate feedback on my present approach, but I'd also like to address the following loose ends before merging:

• Adding tests for how @workflow auth interacts with @inputstep auth and resolving any issues identified in the process.
• Logging step in which an error was encountered if possible (see TODO in current changes)
• Ensure UI is either disabled or user is alerted before hitting Resume Workflow if possible. Current changes only address the backend authorization.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #939 will not alter performance

_{Comparing 931-feature-add-role-based-access-control-to-running-workflows (e4a5e3a) with main (9848fef)}

Summary

✅ 13 untouched benchmarks

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.50%. Comparing base (f0677d1) to head (e4a5e3a).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
orchestrator/workflow.py	90.47%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #939      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.49%   83.50%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         205      205              
  Lines       10206    10225      +19     
  Branches     1022     1025       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         8521     8538      +17     
- Misses       1414     1415       +1     
- Partials      271      272       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[pboers1988]

It might be available in the StateInputStepFunc object