-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Running averages of SDI-12 soil probe data uses wrong time window size #8
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
patricktokeeffe
added a commit
to patricktokeeffe/EasyFlux-DL
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2024
patricktokeeffe
added a commit
to patricktokeeffe/EasyFlux-DL
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2024
patricktokeeffe
added a commit
to patricktokeeffe/EasyFlux-DL
that referenced
this issue
Feb 8, 2024
patricktokeeffe
added a commit
to patricktokeeffe/EasyFlux-DL
that referenced
this issue
Feb 13, 2024
patricktokeeffe
added a commit
to patricktokeeffe/EasyFlux-DL
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
SDI-12 soil sensors (TDR315, 5TM) were moved from the standard 5-second slowsequence into a separate 1-min slowsequence to avoid data acquisition stalling due to sensor delays. By default the running averages are supposed to represent the previous 1-minute of data. However, the parameter dictating the number of samples to include in said averages (
NMBR_SOIL_T_WTR_DEL_SAMPLES
) was not updated and as a result, the averaging windows for those sensors was inadvertently expanded to previous 12 minutes.Standard slow sequence:
New sequence:
The trivial fix (scaling parameter to match new slowsequence time base) would mean just one data point is included in those averages. Maybe it should be a 15-, 20-, or 30-second scan instead?
Alternately: revert the addition of a new slowsequence and specify up-front that if SDI-12 soil sensors are used, the slowsequence interval must be increased from 5000msec to [whatever the actual minimum should be, probably determined through some bench testing].
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: