The 3SAT Problem: Analysis and Report

Problem and Algorithm Overview

The 3SAT Problem

The 3SAT (3-Satisfiability) problem is a fundamental problem in computer science that asks whether a given Boolean formula in 3-Conjunctive Normal Form (3CNF) is satisfiable. A 3CNF formula has these characteristics:

Composed of clauses connected by AND (∧) operators
Each clause contains exactly three literals connected by OR (∨) operators
Each literal is either a variable or its negation

Example formula:

(x₁ ∨ x₂ ∨ ¬x₃) ∧ (¬x₁ ∨ x₂ ∨ x₄) ∧ (x₂ ∨ ¬x₄ ∨ x₃)

Key properties:

NP-complete problem
No known polynomial-time solution
Exhibits phase transition at clause-to-variable ratio ≈ 4.26

Solving Algorithms

1. DPLL (Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland)

A complete algorithm that uses intelligent backtracking and several optimization rules:

Pure Literal Rule
- Identifies variables that appear only positively or negatively
- Assigns values to satisfy these literals immediately
- Example: If x₁ only appears as ¬x₁, assign x₁ = FALSE
Unit Clause Rule
- Identifies clauses with single unassigned literal
- Forces assignment to satisfy these clauses
- Example: For clause (x₁), must assign x₁ = TRUE
Variable Selection
- Chooses most frequent unassigned variable
- Creates two branches (TRUE/FALSE assignments)
- Recursively solves simplified formulas
Formula Simplification
- Removes satisfied clauses
- Removes FALSE literals from remaining clauses
- Detects contradictions early

Pseudo-code:

DPLL(formula, assignment):
  if formula is empty:
    return assignment
  if formula contains empty clause:
    return UNSATISFIABLE
    
  if has_pure_literal(formula):
    apply pure literal rule
    return DPLL(simplified_formula, updated_assignment)
    
  if has_unit_clause(formula):
    apply unit propagation
    return DPLL(simplified_formula, updated_assignment)
    
  var = select_variable(formula)
  return DPLL(formula + {var}) or DPLL(formula + {¬var})

2. Exhaustive Search

A brute-force approach that systematically explores all possible assignments:

Search Space
- 2ⁿ possible assignments for n variables
- Complete exploration guarantees finding solution if exists
Implementation
- Recursive assignment of variables
- Early termination on satisfying assignment
- Complete verification of unsatisfiability

Pseudo-code:

ExhaustiveSearch(formula, current_var, assignment):
  if all variables assigned:
    return evaluate_formula(formula, assignment)
    
  try TRUE assignment:
  assignment[current_var] = TRUE
  if ExhaustiveSearch(formula, current_var + 1, assignment):
    return TRUE
    
  try FALSE assignment:
  assignment[current_var] = FALSE
  return ExhaustiveSearch(formula, current_var + 1, assignment)

3. Phase Transition

The phase transition phenomenon in 3SAT:

Critical Ratio (m/n ≈ 4.26)
- m: number of clauses
- n: number of variables
Behavior
- ratio < 4.26: Usually satisfiable
- ratio > 4.26: Usually unsatisfiable
- At 4.26: Maximum computational difficulty
Impact on Solving
- Hardest instances near critical ratio
- Solving time peaks around transition
- Important for algorithm benchmarking

Executive Summary

This report analyzes the implementation and performance of different 3SAT solver approaches, focusing on the DPLL (Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland) algorithm and exhaustive search. The analysis examines solver behavior across various problem sizes and clause-to-variable ratios, with particular attention to the phase transition phenomenon around the critical ratio of 4.26.

Code Implementation Overview

1. Core Data Structures

@dataclass(frozen=True)
class Literal:
    variable: int
    is_positive: bool

@dataclass
class Clause:
    literals: List[Literal]
    
@dataclass
class Formula:
    clauses: List[Clause]
    num_variables: int

These foundational classes provide immutable, type-safe representations of SAT formula components:

Literal: Immutable representation of variables or their negations
Clause: Groups literals in disjunctive (OR) relationships
Formula: Combines clauses in conjunctive (AND) relationships with variable tracking

2. Abstract Solver Base Class

class SATSolver(ABC):
    @abstractmethod
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    
    def verify_solution(self, formula: Formula, assignment: Dict[int, bool]) -> bool

The abstract base class provides:

Unified interface for all solver implementations
Solution verification functionality
Integrated logging and debugging support
Statistical tracking through SolverStatistics

3. Formula Processing Utilities

class FormulaSimplifier:
    @staticmethod
    def simplify_formula(formula: Formula, assignment: Dict[int, bool]) -> Formula
    
class RandomFormulaGenerator:
    @staticmethod
    def generate(num_variables: int, num_clauses: int, seed: Optional[int] = None) -> Formula

Utility classes handle:

Formula simplification based on partial assignments
Generation of random 3-SAT instances
Phase transition analysis support
Formula validation and preprocessing

4. Statistical Analysis Framework

@dataclass
class StatisticValue:
    type: StatisticType
    value: any
    description: str = ""

class SolverStatistics:
    solving_time_ms: StatisticValue
    successful_solves: StatisticValue
    failed_solves: StatisticValue
    stats: Dict[str, StatisticValue]

Comprehensive statistics tracking:

Timing measurements
Success/failure rates
Solver-specific metrics
Performance analysis support

5. Solver Implementations

DPLL Solver

class DPLLSolver(SATSolver):
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _dpll(self, formula: Formula, assignments: Dict[int, bool]) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]

Features:

Unit propagation
Pure literal elimination
Intelligent variable selection
Non-chronological backtracking
Formula simplification optimization

Random Walk Solver

class RandomSATSolver(SATSolver):
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _random_walk(self, formula: Formula, assignment: Dict[int, bool]) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]

Implements:

Random initial assignment
Local search strategy
Multiple restart capability
Configurable flip limits
Progressive improvement tracking

Exhaustive Solver

class ExhaustiveSATSolver(SATSolver):
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _exhaustive_search(self, formula: Formula, current_var: int) -> bool

Provides:

Complete search space exploration
Early termination optimization
Assignment validation
Progress tracking
Branch depth analysis

6. Analysis and Debugging Tools

class ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer:
    def run_analysis(self, var_sizes: List[int], ratios: List[float], trials_per_config: int,
                    solvers: List[SATSolver]) -> None
    
class DebugVisualizer:
    def plot_results(self) -> None

Analysis capabilities:

Performance comparison across solvers
Phase transition visualization
Statistical analysis of results
Debug visualization tools
Solver behavior analysis

7. Visualization Components

Analysis output includes:

Phase transition plots
Time complexity analysis
Success rate heatmaps
Performance comparisons
Statistical summaries
Debug information visualization

The implementation provides a comprehensive framework for:

Solving 3-SAT problems using multiple strategies
Analyzing solver performance and behavior
Visualizing results and phase transitions
Debugging and validating solutions
Collecting detailed performance metrics

Solver Implementations

1. DPLL Solver

class DPLLSolver(SATSolver):
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _dpll(self, formula: Formula, assignments: Dict[int, bool]) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _find_pure_literal(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Literal]
    def _choose_next_variable(self, formula: Formula) -> int

The DPLL solver implements a complete SAT solving algorithm with several optimizations:

Core Algorithm Components:
- Recursive DPLL implementation with backtracking
- Integrated statistics tracking throughout the solving process
- Depth tracking for decision tree analysis
- Early termination on satisfying assignments
Formula Simplification Strategies:
- Unit Propagation: Automatically assigns variables in single-literal clauses
- Pure Literal Elimination: Identifies and assigns variables that appear with only one polarity
- Smart Variable Selection: Chooses variables based on frequency analysis
- Formula Simplification: Removes satisfied clauses and updates remaining ones
Statistical Monitoring:
- Tracks decision depths throughout search
- Monitors unit propagation frequency
- Records pure literal elimination events
- Measures backtracking frequency
- Maintains clause size statistics
Optimization Features:
- Variable selection heuristic based on frequency analysis
- Efficient assignment completion for satisfied formulas
- Integrated formula simplification
- Progressive depth tracking for analysis

2. Random Walk Solver

class RandomSATSolver(SATSolver):
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _random_walk(self, formula: Formula, assignment: Dict[int, bool]) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _generate_random_assignment(self, num_variables: int) -> Dict[int, bool]

Implements a probabilistic SAT solving approach with the following features:

Core Random Walk Strategy:
- Configurable maximum flips and tries
- Random initial assignment generation
- Iterative improvement through variable flips
- Multiple restart capability on local minimums
Search Process:
- Starts with random complete assignment
- Identifies unsatisfied clauses
- Randomly selects variables from unsatisfied clauses
- Flips variable values to improve satisfaction
- Tracks progress toward solution
Performance Monitoring:
- Counts total variable flips
- Tracks successful improvement steps
- Monitors restart frequency
- Records unsatisfied clause counts
- Measures improvement per flip
Optimization Features:
- Early termination on solution found
- Local minima detection
- Adaptive restart strategy
- Progress tracking for analysis
- Solution verification at each step

3. Exhaustive Solver

class ExhaustiveSATSolver(SATSolver):
    def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]
    def _exhaustive_search(self, formula: Formula, current_var: int) -> bool

Provides a complete systematic search approach:

Search Implementation:
- Systematic variable assignment exploration
- Recursive depth-first search strategy
- Complete solution space coverage
- Early termination on satisfying assignments
- Efficient backtracking mechanism
Assignment Processing:
- Progressive variable assignment
- Complete assignment verification
- Systematic space exploration
- Solution validation at leaves
- Partial assignment testing
Performance Tracking:
- Counts nodes visited during search
- Records complete assignments tested
- Tracks partial assignment validations
- Monitors branch exploration depths
- Records solution discovery depths
Statistical Analysis:
- Branch depth analysis
- Solution distribution patterns
- Search space coverage metrics
- Performance bottleneck identification
- Comparative efficiency analysis

Common Implementation Features

All solver implementations share these characteristics:

Architectural Components:
- Inherit from abstract SATSolver base class
- Implement common solution verification
- Utilize shared statistics framework
- Support debugging capabilities
- Maintain consistent interface
Solution Handling:
- Return Optional[Dict[int, bool]] assignments
- Verify solutions before returning
- Handle unsatisfiable cases gracefully
- Support partial assignment completion
- Maintain assignment consistency
Statistical Integration:
- Track solving time automatically
- Record success and failure rates
- Maintain solver-specific metrics
- Support performance analysis
- Enable comparative evaluation
Debug Support:
- Configurable debug output
- Detailed logging capabilities
- Step-by-step tracking options
- Performance profiling support
- Error detection and reporting

Each solver implementation is designed to be:

Modular and maintainable
Statistically instrumented
Performance optimized
Debug-friendly
Easily extensible

Analysis Framework

The analysis framework consists of three main components: statistics tracking, comprehensive analysis, and debugging visualization.

1. Statistics Framework

@dataclass
class StatisticValue:
    type: StatisticType
    value: any
    description: str = ""

class SolverStatistics:
    def __init__(self):
        self.solving_time_ms: StatisticValue
        self.successful_solves: StatisticValue
        self.failed_solves: StatisticValue
        self.variable_assignments: StatisticValue

The statistics system provides:

Core Statistics Types:
- Counter: Incremental numeric values
- Timer: Execution time measurements
- List: Collections of sequential data
- Ratio: Calculated proportional values
Solver-Specific Statistics:
- DPLL:
  - Backtrack count
  - Unit propagation frequency
  - Pure literal eliminations
  - Decision tree depths
  - Variable selection frequencies
- Random Walk:
  - Flip counts and success rates
  - Restart frequencies
  - Local minima encounters
  - Improvement metrics
  - Unsatisfied clause tracking
- Exhaustive:
  - Node visit counts
  - Assignment test counts
  - Branch depth tracking
  - Solution discovery depths
  - Validation frequencies
Statistical Operations:
- Timing management (start/stop)
- Counter incrementation
- List appending
- Value setting
- Statistics reset

2. Comprehensive Analysis

class ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer:
    def run_analysis(
        self,
        var_sizes: List[int],
        ratios: List[float],
        trials_per_config: int,
        solvers: List[SATSolver]
    ) -> None

The analyzer provides extensive analysis capabilities:

Configuration Options:
- Variable sizes (n)
- Clause-to-variable ratios
- Number of trials per configuration
- Solver selection
- Performance metrics
Analysis Types:
- Phase transition visualization
- Time complexity analysis
- Success rate evaluation
- Performance comparison
- Statistical correlation

Visualization Components:

def _plot_phase_transition(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None:
def _plot_time_complexity(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None:
def _plot_heatmaps(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None:

Phase transition curves
Solver timing distributions
Success rate heatmaps
Performance correlation plots
Statistical summary displays

Data Processing:
- Results aggregation
- Statistical computation
- Data normalization
- Outlier detection
- Trend analysis

3. Debug Visualization

@dataclass
class DebugResult:
    n: int
    ratio: float
    solver_name: str
    solving_time: float
    is_correct: bool
    is_satisfiable: bool
    solver_stats: Dict[str, Any]

class DebugVisualizer:
    def plot_results(self) -> None

The debug visualization system provides:

Visualization Types:

def _plot_success_rate_heatmap(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None
def _plot_time_distribution(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None
def _plot_problem_areas(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None
def _plot_stats_summary(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None

Success rate visualization
Time distribution analysis
Problem area identification
Statistical summaries
Performance bottleneck detection

Debug Features:
- Result correctness verification
- Performance anomaly detection
- Error pattern identification
- Solution validation
- Statistical outlier detection
Analysis Reports:
```
def _print_mismatch_report(self, df: pd.DataFrame) -> None
```
- Detailed mismatch reporting
- Performance bottleneck identification
- Statistical anomaly detection
- Error pattern analysis
- Solution verification results

4. Integration and Usage

def run_comprehensive_analysis():
    analyzer = ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer()
    
    # Configuration
    small_n = [5, 10, 15]  # For all solvers
    large_n = [20, 25, 30]  # For DPLL only
    ratios = [3.0, 3.5, 3.8, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.26, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, 5.0]
    trials_per_config = 10

The framework supports:

Problem configuration
Solver execution
Data collection
Result analysis
Visualization generation

File Organization

The project is organized into focused, modular files that separate core functionality, utilities, and analysis tools:

1. Core Implementation Files

`SAT.py`

Core solver implementations (DPLL, Random, Exhaustive)
Abstract base solver class
Solver strategy enumeration
Logging configuration

`Utilities.py`

Core data structures (Literal, Clause, Formula)
Formula simplification utilities
Random formula generation
Common utility functions

`SolverStats.py`

Statistics tracking framework
Solver-specific statistics classes
Statistics analysis utilities
Performance metric tracking

2. Analysis Files

`ComprehensiveAnalysis.py`

Comprehensive solver analysis
Performance visualization
Phase transition analysis
Statistical data collection
Results visualization

`Debug.py`

Debug visualization tools
Performance testing utilities
Result validation
Interactive debugging interface
Visual analysis tools

Code Flow

1. Initialization Flow

# Create solvers with statistics tracking
dpll_solver = DPLLSolver(debug=False)
random_solver = RandomSATSolver()
exhaustive_solver = ExhaustiveSATSolver()

# Initialize analysis tools
analyzer = ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer()

2. Problem Generation

# Generate random 3-SAT formula
generator = RandomFormulaGenerator()
formula = generator.generate(
    num_variables=n,
    num_clauses=int(n * ratio)
)

3. Solving Process

DPLL Solver Flow

def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]:
    self.stats.start_timer()
    try:
        result = self._dpll(formula, {})
        if result is not None:
            self.stats.successful_solves.value += 1
        else:
            self.stats.failed_solves.value += 1
        return result
    finally:
        self.stats.stop_timer()

Random Solver Flow

def solve(self, formula: Formula) -> Optional[Dict[int, bool]]:
    self.stats.start_timer()
    try:
        for _ in range(self.max_tries):
            self.stats.increment("restart_count")
            assignment = self._generate_random_assignment(formula.num_variables)
            result = self._random_walk(formula, assignment)
            if result is not None:
                self.stats.successful_solves.value += 1
                return result
        self.stats.failed_solves.value += 1
        return None
    finally:
        self.stats.stop_timer()

4. Analysis Execution

def run_analysis(self, var_sizes, ratios, trials_per_config, solvers):
    # Run small instances with all solvers
    for n in small_n:
        for ratio in ratios:
            for _ in range(trials_per_config):
                self._run_single_trial(n, ratio, solvers)
    
    # Run larger instances with DPLL only
    for n in large_n:
        for ratio in ratios:
            for _ in range(trials_per_config):
                self._run_single_trial(n, ratio, [dpll_solver])

5. Visualization Generation

# Generate comprehensive visualizations
analyzer.plot_results(results)

6. Data Flow Through Components

Formula Creation:

RandomFormulaGenerator → Formula → Clause → Literal

Solving Process:

Solver → FormulaSimplifier → Statistics Collection → Result

Analysis Flow:

ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer → Results Collection → Data Processing → Visualization

Debug Flow:

DebugVisualizer → Performance Analysis → Result Validation → Visual Output

7. Execution Entry Points

Main Analysis

if __name__ == "__main__":
    run_comprehensive_analysis()

Debug Session

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()  # Debug visualization interface

Analysis Methodology

The analysis framework employs a multi-faceted approach to evaluate SAT solver performance and behavior across different problem configurations:

1. Parameter Space Exploration

# Configuration parameters
small_n = [5, 10, 15]  # For all solvers
large_n = [20, 25, 30]  # For DPLL only
ratios = [3.0, 3.5, 3.8, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.26, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, 5.0]
trials_per_config = 10

Variable Sizes (n):
- Small instances (n ≤ 15): All solvers tested
- Medium instances (15 < n ≤ 20): DPLL and Random Walk
- Large instances (n > 20): DPLL only
- Ensures comprehensive coverage of problem scales
- Allows performance comparison at tractable sizes
Clause-to-Variable Ratios:
- Dense sampling around phase transition (4.26)
- Pre-transition range: 3.0 - 4.0
- Critical region: 4.1 - 4.4
- Post-transition range: 4.5 - 5.0
- Captures behavior across satisfiability spectrum
Trial Configuration:
- Multiple trials per parameter combination
- Statistical significance through repetition
- Variance analysis across trials
- Outlier detection and handling
- Confidence interval calculation

2. Performance Metrics

class SolverStatistics:
    # Core metrics
    solving_time_ms: StatisticValue
    successful_solves: StatisticValue
    failed_solves: StatisticValue
    
    # Solver-specific metrics
    stats: Dict[str, StatisticValue]

Time Performance:
- Solving time in milliseconds
- Time distribution analysis
- Scaling behavior assessment
- Performance bottleneck identification
- Timeout handling and analysis
Success Metrics:
- Solution success rate
- SAT/UNSAT distribution
- Phase transition sharpness
- Solution quality assessment
- Reliability analysis
Algorithm-Specific Metrics:
- DPLL:
  - Backtrack frequency
  - Decision tree depth
  - Unit propagation efficiency
  - Pure literal elimination impact
- Random Walk:
  - Flip effectiveness
  - Restart necessity
  - Local minima frequency
  - Convergence patterns
- Exhaustive:
  - Search space coverage
  - Branch pruning efficiency
  - Solution depth distribution
  - Assignment testing rate

3. Visualization Methods

class ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer:
    def plot_results(self, results: dict) -> None:
        self._plot_phase_transition(df)
        self._plot_time_complexity(df)
        self._plot_heatmaps(df)
        self._print_statistical_analysis(df)

Phase Transition Analysis:
- Satisfiability probability curves
- Critical ratio identification
- Transition width measurement
- Regional behavior analysis
- Cross-size comparison
Time Complexity Analysis:
- Scaling visualization
- Algorithmic efficiency comparison
- Resource usage patterns
- Performance prediction models
- Bottleneck identification
Performance Heatmaps:
- Success rate distribution
- Time complexity patterns
- Parameter sensitivity analysis
- Critical region identification
- Performance optimization guidance
Statistical Summaries:
- Mean performance metrics
- Variance analysis
- Distribution characteristics
- Outlier identification
- Confidence intervals

4. Data Collection and Processing

def _run_single_trial(self, n: int, ratio: float, solvers: List[SATSolver]) -> None:
    generator = RandomFormulaGenerator()
    formula = generator.generate(n, int(n * ratio))
    
    results = {}
    for solver in solvers:
        # Collect solver statistics
        result = solver.solve(formula)
        self._process_solver_results(solver, result, results)

Data Collection:
- Systematic parameter sampling
- Comprehensive metric tracking
- Error handling and logging
- Performance monitoring
- Result validation
Statistical Processing:
- Data aggregation
- Outlier detection
- Normalization techniques
- Trend analysis
- Correlation studies
Result Validation:
- Solution verification
- Cross-solver comparison
- Statistical significance testing
- Error margin calculation
- Reliability assessment

5. Analysis Automation

def run_comprehensive_analysis():
    analyzer = ComprehensiveSATAnalyzer()
    analyzer.run_analysis(
        var_sizes=var_sizes,
        ratios=ratios,
        trials_per_config=trials_per_config,
        solvers=[dpll_solver, random_solver, exhaustive_solver]
    )

Automated Testing:
- Parameter sweep execution
- Multiple solver comparison
- Batch processing capability
- Progress tracking
- Result aggregation
Result Generation:
- Automated visualization
- Report compilation
- Statistical summary
- Performance analysis
- Recommendation generation

The analysis methodology provides:

Comprehensive solver evaluation
Robust statistical analysis
Clear performance visualization
Detailed behavioral insights
Optimization guidance

This systematic approach enables:

Understanding solver characteristics
Identifying performance patterns
Optimizing solver parameters
Comparing solver effectiveness
Guiding implementation improvements

Key Findings

1. Phase Transition Behavior

The analysis confirms the theoretical phase transition at m/n ≈ 4.26:

Clear transition from mostly satisfiable to mostly unsatisfiable
Sharp drop in satisfiability probability around the critical ratio
Maximum solving time complexity near the transition point
Consistent behavior across different solver types
More pronounced effect at larger problem sizes

2. Algorithm Performance

Performance comparison shows distinct characteristics for each solver:

DPLL Performance

Orders of magnitude faster than exhaustive search
More pronounced advantage as problem size increases
Particularly effective for satisfiable instances
Efficient handling of pure literals and unit clauses
Strong performance in pre-transition region

Random Walk Performance

Most effective in satisfiable region (ratio < 4.26)
Quick solutions for under-constrained problems
Performance degrades sharply near phase transition
High variability in solving times
Restart strategy crucial for effectiveness
Key characteristics:
- Success rate inversely proportional to ratio
- Average flips increase near phase transition
- Restart frequency peaks at critical ratio
- Local minima more common in UNSAT region
- Solution quality improves with longer runs

Exhaustive Search Performance

Predictable exponential scaling
Consistent performance across all ratios
Less efficient than DPLL for all problem sizes
Complete solution space coverage
Useful as verification baseline

3. Scaling Characteristics

All algorithms exhibit expected scaling patterns:

Exponential time growth with problem size
More pronounced scaling near phase transition
DPLL maintains better scaling characteristics throughout
Random Walk scaling heavily dependent on ratio
Crossover points identified between strategies

4. Algorithm-Specific Insights

DPLL Insights

Unit propagation most effective pre-transition
Pure literal elimination efficiency peaks early
Backtracking frequency correlates with ratio
Decision tree depth increases near transition
Variable selection heuristic impact significant

Random Walk Insights

Optimal flip limit varies with problem size
Restart strategy crucial near phase transition
Local minima frequency increases with ratio
Solution quality improves with iteration count
Performance highly sensitive to initial assignment
Critical findings:
- Optimal restart threshold identified
- Success rate patterns mapped
- Flip effectiveness quantified
- Local minima distribution characterized
- Parameter sensitivity analyzed

Exhaustive Search Insights

Branch pruning effectiveness measured
Search space coverage patterns identified
Solution depth distribution mapped
Verification overhead quantified
Resource usage patterns established

5. Statistical Reliability

The implementation shows robust behavior:

Consistent results across multiple trials
Agreement between solver types
Expected variance patterns in solving times
Reliable performance prediction
Statistically significant findings

6. Parameter Sensitivity

Analysis reveals key parameter dependencies:

Clause-to-variable ratio most critical
Problem size impacts strategy selection
Restart thresholds affect random walk
Time limits influence success rates
Initial conditions impact convergence

7. Practical Implications

The findings suggest optimal solver selection criteria:

DPLL: Best for general-purpose solving
Random Walk: Preferred for underconstrained problems
Exhaustive Search: Useful for small verification tasks
Hybrid approaches promising for specific ranges
Parameter tuning guidelines established

These findings provide:

Clear solver selection guidance
Performance optimization strategies
Resource allocation guidelines
Implementation improvement directions
Theoretical validation

Conclusion

The implementation successfully demonstrates the key characteristics of 3SAT solving, particularly the phase transition phenomenon and the effectiveness of the DPLL algorithm. The analysis framework provides valuable insights into solver behavior and performance characteristics, while also validating theoretical predictions about phase transitions in random 3SAT instances.

The results confirm that the DPLL implementation is both correct and efficient, showing expected behavior across all tested parameters. The phase transition analysis aligns well with theoretical predictions, and the performance characteristics match expected complexity bounds.

Future work should focus on implementing modern SAT solving techniques such as clause learning and non-chronological backtracking to further improve performance on larger instances.

Name		Name	Last commit message	Last commit date
Latest commit History 28 Commits
.flake8		.flake8
.gitignore		.gitignore
.pre-commit-config.yaml		.pre-commit-config.yaml
BaseVisualizer.py		BaseVisualizer.py
ComprehensiveAnalysis.py		ComprehensiveAnalysis.py
DPLLDemo.py		DPLLDemo.py
README.md		README.md
RandomDemo.py		RandomDemo.py
SATSolver.py		SATSolver.py
SolverStats.py		SolverStats.py
Utilities.py		Utilities.py
pyproject.toml		pyproject.toml
requirements.txt		requirements.txt

AlexMorrow239/3SAT-Problem

Folders and files

Latest commit

History

Repository files navigation