Fix a typo preventing to use the full int64_t range when using gt<> and lt<> validators #214
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AugusteBourgois
force-pushed
the
pr-fix-numeric-limits-int
branch
from
833b8bd to
2e359de
Compare
christophfroehlich
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2024
|
My pleasure, happy to help. |
pac48
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2024
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi everyone,
This PR fixes #199. Since ROS uses int64_t to store integer parameters, int64_t numeric limits should be used instead of int.
i simply corrected the template files and the associated unit tests.
Any thoughts ?