Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

feat: align 'estimatesmartfee' rpc with bitcoind #1157

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

emjshrx
Copy link
Contributor

@emjshrx emjshrx commented Jun 21, 2023

Changes the returned json attribute from 'estimatesmartfee' rpc to align with bitcoind docs . Also added a crude test to verify the same.

Fixes #1153

@theanmolsharma
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, good call. I'll review it this week.
While I do that if you can, please scrutinize the other RPCs as well. I know this is a tedious and boring task so no pressure.

@emjshrx
Copy link
Contributor Author

emjshrx commented Jun 25, 2023

Thanks, good call. I'll review it this week. While I do that if you can, please scrutinize the other RPCs as well. I know this is a tedious and boring task so no pressure.

Thanks @theanmolsharma . Also I noticed the coverage in RPCs are quite less so can make a test suite for them as well.

@emjshrx
Copy link
Contributor Author

emjshrx commented Jun 25, 2023

Changed the test to be in the right file and ran a formatter on the file

@theanmolsharma
Copy link
Collaborator

Changed the test to be in the right file and ran a formatter on the file

Please revert back the formatter changes.

@emjshrx emjshrx force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 1da7f24 to d1335d3 Compare June 25, 2023 07:51
@theanmolsharma
Copy link
Collaborator

Tested ACK

@pinheadmz
Copy link
Member

since this is a breaking change, we must also include a release note in the CHANGELOG.md anyone who is using this API regularly for their application will get wrecked if they upgrade and don't comply.

@emjshrx
Copy link
Contributor Author

emjshrx commented Jul 4, 2023

since this is a breaking change, we must also include a release note in the CHANGELOG.md anyone who is using this API regularly for their application will get wrecked if they upgrade and don't comply.

Thanks for bringing this to notice @pinheadmz . Have made the changes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (b005869) 69.55% compared to head (350e6b0) 69.57%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1157      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.55%   69.57%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         158      159       +1     
  Lines       26603    26607       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        18505    18511       +6     
+ Misses       8098     8096       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/node/rpc.js 41.96% <ø> (+0.57%) ⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ describe('RPC', function() {
const {genesis} = node.network;
let entry = await node.chain.getEntry(genesis.hash.reverse());

// Get current chain tip and chain height
// Get current chain tip and chain height
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're going to touch this line, it should be like this:

      // Get current chain tip and chain height
      const chainHeight = node.chain.tip.height + 1;
      const chainTip = util.revHex(node.chain.tip.hash);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed this annoying formatting change. I did not intend to touch these lines.

@pinheadmz
Copy link
Member

merged 014a104
thank you!

@pinheadmz pinheadmz closed this Jul 20, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

estimatesmartfee RPC API result inconsistent with Bitcoin Core RPC API (fee vs feerate)
3 participants