Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade node-gyp from 3.8.0 to 8.0.0 #37

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: latest
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bumplzz69
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-REQUEST-3361831
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-TOUGHCOOKIE-5672873
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: node-gyp The new version differs by 203 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
🦉 Prototype Pollution

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants