3.1.11: Add missing Ordinal to parameter StartsWith comparison #23052
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This backports the fix for #18831 to 3.1
roji
changed the title
ajcvickers
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2020
|
@roji Approved for 3.1.11 by Tactics. Please wait until the branch is open for 3.1.11 before merging. |
ajcvickers
changed the title
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original PR merged for 5.0: #18873
This backports the fix for #18831 to 3.1.
Description
A missing StringComparison.Ordinal causes a string comparison to be culture-sensitive, and incorrectly omits the @ placeholder character for parameter names when using the Thai culture.
Customer Impact
EF Core 3.1 is largely unusable when using the Thai culture, without a specific non-trivial workaround (replace the ISqlGenerationHelper service).
How found
Reported three times: #18831, #23032, npgsql/efcore.pg#1508
Test coverage
#22625 added the new code analysis support coming with Roslyn for 5.0, including checks for StringComparison. Using the overload without StringComparison now generates a compilation error.
Regression?
Not within 3.1.x.
Risk
Extremely low - the change adds a missing StringComparison.Ordinal in a single call site.