[GHSA-q25c-c977-4cmh] Server-Side Request Forgery in langchain #4630
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
changed the base branch from
main
to
eyurtsev/advisory-improvement-4630
advisory-database
bot
merged commit bf54aa7
into
eyurtsev/advisory-improvement-4630
2 checks passed
|
Hi @eyurtsev! Thank you so much for contributing to the GitHub Advisory Database. This database is free, open, and accessible to all, and it's people like you who make it great. Thanks for choosing to help others. We hope you send in more contributions in the future! |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates
Comments
Patch has been released:
langchain-ai/langchain#24451
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/releases/tag/langchain-community%3D%3D0.2.9
The original CVE was not associated with the correct package. Huntr does not support mono-repos at the moment, so many issues get classified as corresponding to langchain package, even though the code corresponds to the langchain-community package. The report iself was also unclear and did not differentiate between the repository vs. the package.