Skip to content

Stop emulating mmap on Windows #542

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2016
Merged

Conversation

ankostis
Copy link
Contributor

@ankostis ankostis commented Oct 22, 2016

This is the matching-fix of gitpython-developers/smmap#30

Now 2 more "hidden-errors" TCs pass in Windows (see #525):

  • TestRepo.test_file_handle_leaks()
  • TestObjDbPerformance.test_random_access()

Obviously it is not needed anymore, or nothing is worse without this
monkeypatch.
Now 2 more TCs pass in Windows:
+ TestRepo.test_file_handle_leaks()
+ TestObjDbPerformance.test_random_access()

See gitpython-developers/smmap#30
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 22, 2016

Current coverage is 94.38% (diff: 100%)

Merging #542 into master will increase coverage by 0.04%

@@             master       #542   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            63         63          
  Lines          9885       9875    -10   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
- Hits           9326       9321     -5   
+ Misses          559        554     -5   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update caa0ea7...9db2ff1

@Byron
Copy link
Member

Byron commented Oct 22, 2016

@ankostis Should I merge this one as well ? Maybe it's tied to the ongoing PR in smmap and should thus wait.

@Byron Byron added this to the v2.1.0 - proper windows support milestone Oct 22, 2016
@ankostis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, it is tied as you said.
Please review and merge them in tandem.

@Byron Byron merged commit 9db2ff1 into gitpython-developers:master Oct 22, 2016
@Byron Byron removed the in progress label Oct 22, 2016
@Byron
Copy link
Member

Byron commented Oct 22, 2016

Thank you ! It's in - if you think I should push it right away as 2.1.1, please let me know. Otherwise it will just be part of the next natural point release in a few weeks.

@ankostis
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, no prob. Thanks.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants