-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
License link in footer to license #1397
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
43bd145
Indentation/whitespace fixes
tjschuck 8b567ec
Link to the actual license instead of the Wikipedia page
tjschuck 83421a6
Update copyright year.
tjschuck bcc4442
Add footer to options page.
tjschuck ef8363d
Merge branch 'master' into indentation_and_footer
pfiller 2cbd0c3
Add @koenpunt to the docs pages.
pfiller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1448,12 +1448,9 @@ <h2>Credits</h2> | |
</ul> | ||
|
||
<footer> | ||
© 2011 <a href="http://www.getharvest.com/">Harvest</a> - Chosen is licensed under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License">MIT license</a>. | ||
© 2011 <a href="http://www.getharvest.com/">Harvest</a> — Chosen is licensed under the <a href="https://github.com/harvesthq/chosen/blob/master/LICENSE.md">MIT license</a>. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Save here :) |
||
</footer> | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
</div> | ||
</div> | ||
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/prototype/1.7.0.0/prototype.js" type="text/javascript"></script> | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be 2013? Or 2011-2013?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually looked into this. It allegedly should be earliest publish date, which is 2011. But mostly, it's all stupid. I gave pause, too, and I wouldn't want to imply that this isn't maintained because of the copyright year. I'd vote for 2011-2013, depending on @pfiller's opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is that you want the earliest publishing date as well as the years of any major revisions. Given that, I'd definitely vote for the year span. Even if it's wrong, I still prefer the "this is fresh content" signal of including the latest year.
2011-2013 it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated.