-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
License link in footer to license #1397
Conversation
</ul> | ||
|
||
<footer> | ||
© 2011 <a href="http://www.getharvest.com/">Harvest</a> - Chosen is licensed under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License">MIT license</a>. | ||
© 2011 <a href="http://www.getharvest.com/">Harvest</a> — Chosen is licensed under the <a href="https://github.com/harvesthq/chosen/blob/master/LICENSE.md">MIT license</a>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be 2013? Or 2011-2013?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually looked into this. It allegedly should be earliest publish date, which is 2011. But mostly, it's all stupid. I gave pause, too, and I wouldn't want to imply that this isn't maintained because of the copyright year. I'd vote for 2011-2013, depending on @pfiller's opinion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My understanding is that you want the earliest publishing date as well as the years of any major revisions. Given that, I'd definitely vote for the year span. Even if it's wrong, I still prefer the "this is fresh content" signal of including the latest year.
2011-2013 it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated.
Update copyright and license link
- CSS Updates #1368, #1371 - Prevent text selection on Chosen #1374 - single_backstroke_delete defaults to true #1375 - No longer expose classes to window context #1389 - Single select value fix #1392 - Remove javascript:void and attr references #1385, #1377 - Disable Chosen on iPhone / iPod and Android mobile devices by default #1388 - Add Destroy Method #1396 - Option to Hide Selected & Disabled Options #1404 - Always clear result highlight #1407 - Replace characters only once #1411 - Document all the things. #1366, #1376, #1383 - Add Gemfile for compass dependency #1373 - Update copyright and license link #1397 - Add @koenpunt as a maintainer #1399 - Add anchors to documentation headers #1395 - Updated stackoverflow instructions #1403
Linking the "MIT License" footer link to the Wikipedia page is a little weird. We should probably just link to the actual license.
(Also, some indentation and whitespace fixes.)