Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Decouple scda #214

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

Decouple scda #214

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

gogonzo
Copy link
Contributor

@gogonzo gogonzo commented Jun 30, 2023

@gogonzo gogonzo added the core label Jun 30, 2023
@gogonzo gogonzo changed the title remove scda Decouple scda Jun 30, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 30, 2023

badge

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                    Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
------------------------  -------  ------  -------  --------------
R/tm_g_ae_oview.R             247     247  0.00%    108-388
R/tm_g_ae_sub.R               316     316  0.00%    56-408
R/tm_g_butterfly.R            385     385  0.00%    135-560
R/tm_g_decorate.R              46      46  0.00%    18-98
R/tm_g_events_term_id.R       296     296  0.00%    62-396
R/tm_g_heat_bygrade.R         318     318  0.00%    161-514
R/tm_g_patient_profile.R      708     708  0.00%    197-970
R/tm_g_spiderplot.R           321     321  0.00%    103-469
R/tm_g_swimlane.R             375     375  0.00%    129-561
R/tm_g_waterfall.R            422     422  0.00%    113-586
R/utils.R                      37      32  13.51%   32-91, 124-131
R/zzz.R                         1       1  0.00%    2
TOTAL                        3472    3467  0.14%

Diff against main

Filename      Stmts    Miss  Cover
----------  -------  ------  --------
TOTAL             0       0  +100.00%

Results for commit: 7f33743

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 30, 2023

Unit Tests Summary

  1 files    1 suites   0s ⏱️
  4 tests   4 ✔️ 0 💤 0
13 runs  13 ✔️ 0 💤 0

Results for commit eb019fa.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@chlebowa chlebowa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not mind using data sets defined in osprey as this package Depends on osprey, however I do recall it being said that all packages should contain their own data sets for tests. If that is not a crucial requirement, this is good to go.

@gogonzo gogonzo merged commit b6de623 into main Jul 6, 2023
@gogonzo gogonzo deleted the decouple_scda@main branch July 6, 2023 08:04
gogonzo added a commit to insightsengineering/scda that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
- [ ] teal insightsengineering/teal#858
- [ ] teal.widgets
- [ ] osprey insightsengineering/osprey#121
- [ ] teal.osprey
insightsengineering/teal.osprey#214
- [ ] teal.transform
insightsengineering/teal.transform#139

---------

Signed-off-by: Dawid Kałędkowski <6959016+gogonzo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kartikeya kirar <kirar.kartikeya1@gmail.com>
gogonzo added a commit to insightsengineering/scda.2022 that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Decouple scda
2 participants