Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Cleanup TypeUtil and ModuleLocation to allow jetty-client/hybrid to work on Android #6052

Closed
joakime opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6053
Closed

Cleanup TypeUtil and ModuleLocation to allow jetty-client/hybrid to work on Android #6052

joakime opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #6053
Labels
Enhancement Sponsored This issue affects a user with a commercial support agreement Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests

Comments

@joakime
Copy link
Contributor

joakime commented Mar 10, 2021

Jetty version
9.4.x

Java version
Android

OS type/version
Android

Description
When attempting to use jetty-client-<ver>-hybrid.jar on Android.
The TypeUtil has an optional dependency on ModuleLocation which uses MethodHandle.invoke and MethodHandle.invokeExact, both of which are not supported by Android (yet)

Attempt to make the use of ModuleLocation in a more optional way.

joakime added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2021
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
@joakime joakime linked a pull request Mar 10, 2021 that will close this issue
joakime added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2021
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
joakime added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2021
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
joakime added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2021
Issue #6052 - make ModuleLocation optional on Android
@joakime joakime added Enhancement Sponsored This issue affects a user with a commercial support agreement labels Apr 2, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 3, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been a
full year without activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests label Apr 3, 2022
@joakime
Copy link
Contributor Author

joakime commented Apr 3, 2022

Merged PR #6053

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Enhancement Sponsored This issue affects a user with a commercial support agreement Stale For auto-closed stale issues and pull requests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant