Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #1963]Adding #[inline] for IndexService methods #1964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 31, 2024

Conversation

nakul-py
Copy link
Contributor

@nakul-py nakul-py commented Dec 27, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Adding #[inline] for IndexService methods

Fixes #1963

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new helper function for key construction.
  • Performance Improvements

    • Enhanced performance of multiple methods by adding optimizations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on performance optimization for the IndexService in the RocketMQ store by adding the #[inline] attribute to multiple methods. This attribute suggests to the compiler that these methods should be inlined, potentially reducing function call overhead. Additionally, a new helper function build_key is introduced to construct keys by concatenating a topic and a key with a separator.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/index/index_service.rs - Added #[inline] to multiple methods including new, load, get_total_size, delete_expired_file, destroy, query_offset, build_index, put_key, retry_get_and_create_index_file, get_and_create_last_index_file, and flush
- Added new helper function build_key for key construction

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add #[inline] to IndexService methods [#1963]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

🚀 Inline magic, compiler's delight,
Methods dancing with performance might,
Keys built swift, no overhead in sight,
RocketMQ's speed takes a quantum flight,
Optimization's rabbit takes flight! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@nakul-py 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-store/src/index/index_service.rs (2)

Line range hint 139-191: Query logic is large for inlining
query_offset is a lengthy method to retrieve offsets based on time bounds and keys.

  • Inlining a large function can increase compile times and possibly reduce clarity, though it may reduce call overhead in tight loops.
  • No functional issues spotted.

Line range hint 378-385: Use of #[inline] on a helper
build_key is a straightforward helper function to concatenate strings.

  • Consider using format!("{}#{}", topic, key) for even clearer code.
  • No functional concerns.
-fn build_key(topic: &str, key: &str) -> String {
-    let mut keys = String::new();
-    keys.push_str(topic);
-    keys.push('#');
-    keys.push_str(key);
-    keys
+fn build_key(topic: &str, key: &str) -> String {
+    format!("{}#{}", topic, key)
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2b5dbd and 4bfeb01.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/index/index_service.rs (12 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
rocketmq-store/src/index/index_service.rs (10)

Line range hint 53-60: Adding #[inline] to constructor method
This method initializes several fields and sets up the IndexService.

  • The addition of #[inline] is a valid optimization hint for performance-sensitive contexts.
  • Ensure that calling this constructor is frequent enough to justify inlining overhead.

Line range hint 68-99: Consider the cost-benefit of inlining I/O-bound logic
The load method performs file system operations and populates the in-memory index list. Inlining large or I/O-heavy functions might not yield significant speed benefits. Nonetheless, there is no functional risk in using #[inline].


Line range hint 101-109: Small accessor function inline
get_total_size is a small accessor-like function, so using #[inline] is consistent with Rust best practices for trivial getters.


Line range hint 111-128: Check for edge cases in expiration logic
delete_expired_file walks the index list for files with end_phy_offset < offset. The logic appears sound, and applying #[inline] is acceptable.

  • Ensure that the list ordering is always guaranteed such that earlier files come first.

Line range hint 130-137: Destroy method inlined
destroy clears and destroys index files.

  • Infrequent usage of this method is typical (e.g., shutdown scenario). Inlining might not offer much benefit.
  • Functionality appears correct.

Line range hint 193-256: Index-building logic
build_index is critical for updating index files.

  • Make sure the concurrency around index_file references and default creation is safe.
  • Inlining a large function is a trade-off between performance and code size.

Line range hint 257-283: Consider naming consistency
put_key aligns with the way other internal methods are named. No issues with adding #[inline].

  • Optionally, rename msg to dispatch_request for clarity.

Line range hint 284-304: Retries inlined
retry_get_and_create_index_file attempts up to MAX_TRY_IDX_CREATE times to create an index file.

  • Code logic seems robust.
  • No potential infinite loops since MAX_TRY_IDX_CREATE is finite.

Line range hint 305-357: Background flush inlined
get_and_create_last_index_file can spawn an async flush via tokio::spawn.

  • Inlining makes sense if this is a frequent path.
  • Ensure a Tokio runtime is properly available.

Line range hint 358-377: Flush method
flush potentially updates the store checkpoint if the index file is fully written.

  • Good use of inlining if flush is called in performance-sensitive loops.
  • Functional correctness looks fine.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.32%. Comparing base (a2b5dbd) to head (4bfeb01).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1964   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.32%   28.32%           
=======================================
  Files         486      486           
  Lines       68355    68355           
=======================================
  Hits        19363    19363           
  Misses      48992    48992           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mxsm mxsm changed the title Adding #[inline] for IndexService methods [ISSUE #1963]Adding #[inline] for IndexService methods Dec 31, 2024
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mxsm mxsm merged commit 29b8b7a into mxsm:main Dec 31, 2024
19 of 27 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Dec 31, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Add #[inline] for IndexService methods
4 participants