[ISSUE #2037]Adding #[inline] for BatchConsumeQueue methods. #2039
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on adding the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@nakul-py 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
mxsm,
rocketmq-rust-bot and
TeslaRustor
mxsm
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
rocketmq-store/src/queue/batch_consume_queue.rs (5)
159-159: Keep an eye on code bloat.Inlining
flushcan be beneficial if it’s simple and frequently called. Be mindful of potential code bloat if it’s more complex.
169-169: Assess code-size impact for I/O operations.
truncate_dirty_logic_filestypically involves file operations. Inlining might not yield big gains if most time is in I/O. Re-evaluate after implementation.
196-196: Evaluate method size before inlining.
swap_mapmight become large or complex. Ensure you don’t lose clarity by inlining a heavy operation.
273-273: Boundary-based retrieval.
get_offset_in_queue_by_time_boundarymight be more complex than it appears. Confirm final size and performance before committing to inline.
317-317: Offset increment logic.
increase_queue_offsetcan be frequent but may contain branching logic. Confirm final size before retaining inline.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-store/src/queue/batch_consume_queue.rs(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (33)
rocketmq-store/src/queue/batch_consume_queue.rs (33)
81-81: Ensure meaningful inlining for constructor.Inlining a constructor is usually fine for small or frequently used functions. Verify that it provides a tangible performance benefit and doesn’t bloat the compiled code.
136-136: Inline usage with pending implementation.The method is only a stub (
todo!()). Inlining an unimplemented method is harmless, but be sure to verify final performance gains once implemented.
149-149: Confirm performance benefits of inlining.
recoveris also stubbed. Once implemented, confirm that inlining provides measurable benefits, considering potential code-size tradeoffs.
154-154: Awaiting actual logic.Inlining is fine, but method still needs implementation. Reassess once
todo!()is replaced with real logic.
164-164: Destroy method: inline rationale check.Once implemented, confirm if inlining this method is beneficial compared to the cost in code size.
174-174: Examine complexities in file deletion logic.
delete_expired_filemay contain non-trivial file handling. Inlining might not help if the logic is large. Keep an eye on code-size tradeoffs once implemented.
179-179: Consider minimal overhead.
roll_next_fileis presumably short and frequently called, which can justify inlining. Confirm after thetodo!()is replaced with real logic.
184-184: Only stubbed.
is_first_file_availableis also stubbed. No concerns about inlining yet, but confirm performance effect once the body is defined.
189-189: Inline check for file existence.Likely a quick check, so inlining might be appropriate. Revisit after
todo!().
206-206: Clean-up logic inlined.
clean_swapped_mapmight be short, but if it involves more than minimal bookkeeping, recheck inlining overhead when implemented.
213-213: Getter inlining.
get_topicis presumably trivial, so inlining is valid. Approved.
218-218: Only a trivial getter.
get_queue_idalso appears trivial. Inlining is fine here.
223-223: Inline for performance.If
getremains simple or used frequently, inlining might help by removing function-call overhead.
228-228: Method complexity tbd.
get_cq_unit_and_store_timemight become non-trivial. Evaluate final complexity before deciding if inlining is still beneficial.
233-233: Earliest unit fetch.If
get_earliest_unit_and_store_timeis a small aggregator, inlining is sensible. Reassess post-implementation.
238-238: Simple getter.Likely trivial. Inlining
get_earliest_unitis a good micro-optimization.
243-243: Inline newly stubbed method.
get_latest_unitis presumably short. Confirm final complexity after real logic is added.
[approval]
248-248: Check method usage frequency.
get_last_offsetis presumably called frequently. Inlining might help performance.
253-253: Trivial offset method.
get_min_offset_in_queueis likely minimal. Inlining is sensible.
258-258: Likewise for max offset.
get_max_offset_in_queueis also a short method. Inlining is good to reduce call overhead.
263-263: Potentially quick counter logic.
get_message_total_in_queueis presumably a straightforward calculation. Inlining can help.
268-268: Time-based offset retrieval.
get_offset_in_queue_by_timemay not always benefit from inlining if logic or data structures are large. Revisit once implemented.
282-282: Simple fetch?
get_max_physic_offsetsuggests a quick read from an atomic or field. Inlining is reasonable.
287-287: Direct atomic read.
get_min_logic_offsetpresumably returns a stored offset. Inline usage is fine.
292-292: Enum or constant fetch.
get_cq_typelikely returns a small constant. It’s a good inlining candidate.
297-297: Inline total size retrieval.
get_total_sizepresumably reads a small field or calculates from known state. Inlining is good.
302-302: Inline for short function.
get_unit_sizeis presumably constant or a small field access. Good candidate for inlining.
307-307: Be mindful when implementing.
correct_min_offsetdepends on logic not shown. If extensive, recheck inlining feasibility.
312-312: Posting logic placeholder.
put_message_position_info_wrappermight have non-trivial logic. Reassess the inlining decision once implemented.
327-327: Assigning offsets.
assign_queue_offsetcan be repeated often, so inlining can help if logic remains small. Revisit after actual code is added.
336-336: Estimate logic complexity uncertain.
estimate_message_countcould have a loop and filter checks. Consider final complexity before deciding to keep inlining.
341-341: Container iteration.
iterate_fromis a potentially more involved operation. Evaluate eventual complexity to ensure inlining is still an advantage.
346-346: Potentially heavier iteration.
iterate_from_innermight do more work. Confirm final method size for inlining benefits.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2039 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.51% 28.51%
=======================================
Files 489 489
Lines 68907 68907
=======================================
Hits 19649 19649
Misses 49258 49258 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Add #[inline] for BatchConsumeQueue methods.
Fixes #2037
Summary by CodeRabbit
Performance
#[inline]attribute across various implementations ofBatchConsumeQueue.Code Optimization