Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[ISSUE #2341]🤡Add ReplicaIdentity for rust🧑‍💻 #2342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 19, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2341

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added ReplicaIdentity struct to manage broker replica information
    • Introduced methods for creating, accessing, and modifying broker replica details
    • Implemented string formatting for broker replica representation
  • Chores

    • Expanded protocol module with new broker replica management capabilities

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new module broker_replicas_info to the RocketMQ remoting protocol in Rust. The module defines a ReplicaIdentity struct that represents a broker replica's identity, including fields for broker name, ID, address, and alive status. The struct is designed with Serde serialization support and provides comprehensive getter and setter methods for its properties, along with a custom Display implementation for string representation.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs Added public module declaration for broker_replicas_info
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs New module with ReplicaIdentity struct, including methods for creation, access, and modification

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add ReplicaIdentity for Rust [#2341]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature🚀, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 A Rabbit's Ode to Replica Identity 🐰

In the realm of messaging's might,
A struct emerges, shining bright
ReplicaIdentity, precise and clear
Broker details, now crystal near
Code hops forward with graceful leap! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 19, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs (3)

33-59: Add documentation for constructors.

While the constructors are well-implemented, they would benefit from documentation comments explaining their purpose and parameters.

Add documentation like this:

 impl ReplicaIdentity {
+    /// Creates a new ReplicaIdentity with alive status set to false.
+    ///
+    /// # Arguments
+    /// * `broker_name` - Name of the broker
+    /// * `broker_id` - Unique identifier for the broker
+    /// * `broker_address` - Network address of the broker
     pub fn new(
         broker_name: impl Into<CheetahString>,
         broker_id: u64,
         broker_address: impl Into<CheetahString>,
     ) -> Self {

94-103: Consider optimizing Display implementation.

While the current implementation is correct, it could be more efficient by avoiding string concatenation with line continuation.

Consider this more concise version:

 impl fmt::Display for ReplicaIdentity {
     fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
-        write!(
-            f,
-            "ReplicaIdentity{{ broker_name: '{}', broker_id: {}, broker_address: '{}', alive: {} \
-             }}",
-            self.broker_name, self.broker_id, self.broker_address, self.alive
-        )
+        write!(f, "ReplicaIdentity{{ broker_name: '{}', broker_id: {}, broker_address: '{}', alive: {} }}", 
+            self.broker_name, self.broker_id, self.broker_address, self.alive)
     }
 }

105-176: Add tests for edge cases and validation.

While the test coverage is good for basic functionality, consider adding tests for:

  • Empty/whitespace strings for broker_name and address
  • Maximum u64 value for broker_id
  • Serialization/deserialization with serde

Example additional tests:

#[test]
fn test_empty_strings() {
    let replica = ReplicaIdentity::new("", 1, "");
    assert_eq!(replica.get_broker_name(), &CheetahString::from(""));
    assert_eq!(replica.get_broker_address(), &CheetahString::from(""));
}

#[test]
fn test_max_broker_id() {
    let replica = ReplicaIdentity::new("broker", u64::MAX, "address");
    assert_eq!(replica.get_broker_id(), u64::MAX);
}

#[test]
fn test_serde() {
    let replica = ReplicaIdentity::new("broker", 1, "address");
    let json = serde_json::to_string(&replica).unwrap();
    let deserialized: ReplicaIdentity = serde_json::from_str(&json).unwrap();
    assert_eq!(replica, deserialized);
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ddc044b and 9650e09.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)

29-29: LGTM! Module declaration follows conventions.

The new broker_replicas_info module is correctly declared and placed in alphabetical order.

rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs (2)

24-31: LGTM! Struct definition follows best practices.

The ReplicaIdentity struct is well-defined with appropriate derives and field types. The #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] attribute ensures compatibility with RocketMQ's JSON format.


61-92: LGTM! Well-structured getter/setter implementations.

The methods are consistently implemented, with good use of Into<CheetahString> for flexible string handling in setters.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.33%. Comparing base (ddc044b) to head (9650e09).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2342      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   28.22%   28.33%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         504      505       +1     
  Lines       72577    72686     +109     
==========================================
+ Hits        20486    20595     +109     
  Misses      52091    52091              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 09f394e into main Jan 19, 2025
26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 19, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the feature-2341 branch January 19, 2025 15:01
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add ReplicaIdentity for rust
3 participants