[ISSUE #2340]🤡Add ReplicasInfo for rust🧑💻 #2343
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
rocketmq-rust-bot,
SpaceXCN and
TeslaRustor
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs (4)
24-33: Add documentation for the ReplicasInfo struct.The struct is well-designed with appropriate field types and serialization attributes. Consider adding documentation comments to describe the purpose of the struct and its fields.
Add documentation like this:
+/// Represents information about broker replicas in a RocketMQ cluster. +/// +/// This struct maintains information about the master broker and its replicas, +/// including synchronization state and epochs. #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Clone)] #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] pub struct ReplicasInfo { + /// The unique identifier of the master broker master_broker_id: u64, + /// The network address of the master broker master_address: CheetahString, // ... add docs for other fields
102-126: Refactor duplicate logic in existence check methods.The
is_exist_in_syncandis_exist_in_not_syncmethods contain identical logic for checking replica existence. Consider extracting this into a private helper method.impl ReplicasInfo { + fn matches_replica(replica: &ReplicaIdentity, broker_name: &str, broker_id: u64, broker_address: &str) -> bool { + replica.broker_name == broker_name + && replica.broker_id == broker_id + && replica.broker_address == broker_address + } + pub fn is_exist_in_sync(&self, broker_name: &str, broker_id: u64, broker_address: &str) -> bool { - self.in_sync_replicas.iter().any(|replica| { - replica.broker_name == broker_name - && replica.broker_id == broker_id - && replica.broker_address == broker_address - }) + self.in_sync_replicas.iter().any(|replica| Self::matches_replica(replica, broker_name, broker_id, broker_address)) } pub fn is_exist_in_not_sync(&self, broker_name: &str, broker_id: u64, broker_address: &str) -> bool { - self.not_in_sync_replicas.iter().any(|replica| { - replica.broker_name == broker_name - && replica.broker_id == broker_id - && replica.broker_address == broker_address - }) + self.not_in_sync_replicas.iter().any(|replica| Self::matches_replica(replica, broker_name, broker_id, broker_address)) }
292-386: Add test cases for edge cases.The test coverage is comprehensive, but consider adding tests for:
- Empty strings in broker names and addresses
- Special characters in addresses (e.g., IPv6 addresses)
- Unicode characters in broker names
#[test] fn handles_empty_strings() { let replicas_info = ReplicasInfo::new(1, "", 100, 200, vec![], vec![]); assert_eq!(replicas_info.get_master_address(), ""); } #[test] fn handles_ipv6_addresses() { let replicas_info = ReplicasInfo::new( 1, "[2001:db8::1]:9876", 100, 200, vec![], vec![], ); assert_eq!(replicas_info.get_master_address(), "[2001:db8::1]:9876"); }
31-32: Consider using HashSet for better lookup performance.For large numbers of replicas, using
HashSetinstead ofVeccould improve the performance of existence checks from O(n) to O(1).- in_sync_replicas: Vec<ReplicaIdentity>, - not_in_sync_replicas: Vec<ReplicaIdentity>, + in_sync_replicas: HashSet<ReplicaIdentity>, + not_in_sync_replicas: HashSet<ReplicaIdentity>,Note: This would require adjusting the constructor and setter methods to convert from Vec to HashSet, and the getter methods to return a reference to HashSet instead.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/broker_replicas_info.rs (1)
54-100: LGTM! Well-implemented getter and setter methods.The getter and setter methods are implemented correctly with appropriate ownership semantics and type conversions.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2343 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 28.33% 28.47% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 505 505
Lines 72686 72844 +158
==========================================
+ Hits 20595 20741 +146
- Misses 52091 52103 +12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #2340
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ReplicasInfostruct for managing broker replica informationTests
ReplicasInfostruct and its methods