Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

Consumer pause docs update #742

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Consumer pause docs update #742

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

mtmk
Copy link
Collaborator

@mtmk mtmk commented Feb 17, 2025

No description provided.

@mtmk mtmk requested a review from Jarema February 19, 2025 19:05
@mtmk mtmk marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2025 19:05
MauriceVanVeen
MauriceVanVeen approved these changes Feb 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@MauriceVanVeen MauriceVanVeen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mtmk mtmk merged commit e899639 into main Feb 19, 2025
13 checks passed
@mtmk mtmk deleted the consumers-pause-docs-update branch February 19, 2025 20:05
mtmk added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
@mtmk
Release 2.5.9
961e79f 
* Fix ordered consumer creation (#746)
* Consumer pause docs update (#742)
@mtmk mtmk mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Merged
mtmk added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
@mtmk
Release 2.5.9 (#748)
58e1646 
* Release 2.5.9

* Fix ordered consumer creation (#746)
* Consumer pause docs update (#742)

* Update version.txt
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Reviewers

@MauriceVanVeen MauriceVanVeen MauriceVanVeen approved these changes

@Jarema Jarema Awaiting requested review from Jarema

@scottf scottf Awaiting requested review from scottf

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mtmk @MauriceVanVeen