Skip to content

doc: remove spurious new line in CHANGELOG_V6.md #8009

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lpinca
Copy link
Member

@lpinca lpinca commented Aug 8, 2016

Checklist
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

doc

Description of change

Removes a spurious new line in v6.3.1 changelog.

Ref: nodejs/nodejs.org#837

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Aug 8, 2016
@lpinca
Copy link
Member Author

lpinca commented Aug 8, 2016

This is probably an unnecessary change but it triggers my OCD.

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Aug 8, 2016

LGTM… 😄

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Aug 8, 2016

LGTM

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Aug 8, 2016

;-) LGTM

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2016
PR-URL: #8009
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Aug 9, 2016

Landed in dabac8a

@jasnell jasnell closed this Aug 9, 2016
@lpinca lpinca deleted the remove/newline branch August 9, 2016 19:39
@cjihrig cjihrig mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2016
cjihrig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2016
PR-URL: #8009
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@cjihrig cjihrig mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2016
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants