-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add fields to store planning time in pick-and-place #43
Conversation
This will break ABI in a difficult way for Kinetic. I believe this should be merged into ROS-M, which we haven't branched for yet. We are having a maintainer meeting on March 20th and will be discussing branching. Would you like to join this discussion? |
It makes sense to me to put this off until ROS-M. |
I agree, we should not merge this into kinetic. |
@aochiai please email me so I can invite you. |
9c0ef4b
to
343a726
Compare
@aochiai I have created the new branch |
@@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ string[] trajectory_descriptions | |||
# The performed grasp, if attempt was successful | |||
Grasp grasp | |||
|
|||
# The amount of time in seconds it took to complete the plan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems ambiguous. Is it the time to plan or the time to execute the plan? Maybe reword to "it took to generate a plan"
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ string[] trajectory_descriptions | |||
# The successful place location, if any | |||
PlaceLocation place_location | |||
|
|||
# The amount of time in seconds it took to complete the plan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems ambiguous. Is it the time to plan or the time to execute the plan? Maybe reword to "it took to generate a plan"
@aochiai Can you rewrite the comment to make it less ambiguous in another PR? |
Add new fields to store planning time of the pick-and-place capability.
MoveGroup.action
already has this.