Skip to content

[beta] Update toml to fix a regression in backcompat #3890

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2017

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 1, 2017

📌 Commit 536638d has been approved by alexcrichton

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive
Copy link

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against rust-1.17.0. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 536638d with merge d65e554...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 1, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

Travis looks to have switched to rustup.rs
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 1, 2017

📌 Commit a03032d has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 1, 2017

⌛ Testing commit a03032d with merge d8d0940...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2017
[beta] Update toml to fix a regression in backcompat

Related to rust-lang/rust#40956
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 1, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing d8d0940 to rust-1.17.0...

@bors bors merged commit a03032d into rust-lang:rust-1.17.0 Apr 1, 2017
@ehuss ehuss added this to the 1.17.0 milestone Feb 6, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants