Description
There are a bunch of tests that say ignore-wasm
or ignore-emscripten
or ignore-$platform
with a comment "no panic support" or "no panic". It would be good to audit them and see if one or more of the following capability-based conditional test execution directives can be used instead:
//@ needs-unwind
//@ needs-threads
//@ needs-subprocess
1
If those are not sufficient, it would be good to improve the ignore reason anyway.
Footnotes
-
I'm still working on implementing this directive over at compiletest: add a
needs-subprocess
directive #128295. ↩
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Area: Panicking machineryArea: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustcCategory: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup.Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.