Skip to content

Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot" #101942

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2022

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

This reverts PR #101711.

The PR broke the rustc/bootstrap benchmark on rustc-perf, I believe due to the assumption that the stage0 directory exists. Fixing that by just skipping this logic might be reasonable, but I think there's a larger discussion to be had around the right behavior when we don't have a single bin/ directory (when rustc= and cargo= are specified in config.toml). I think it's potentially reasonable to put those binaries (cargo, rustc, rustfmt?) into the bin directory, but for now just want to get us back to a healthy state.

r? @jyn514 (but would appreciate review from others as this is just a direct revert).

@rustbot rustbot added the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Sep 17, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 17, 2022
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Sep 17, 2022

@bors r+

cc @chenyukang, I'd like to fix the underlying bug but there's some urgency since it broke perf.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 17, 2022

📌 Commit f0c78ee has been approved by jyn514

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 17, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors p=1 since we want to avoid a broken benchmark for long, I think.

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Sep 17, 2022

I think there's a larger discussion to be had around the right behavior when we don't have a single bin/ directory (when rustc= and cargo= are specified in config.toml). I think it's potentially reasonable to put those binaries (cargo, rustc, rustfmt?) into the bin directory

I think this is the right approach, yeah. Even for distro binaries, I don't see why you wouldn't be able to use them with in-tree std as long as they're able to compile it.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#101093 (Initial version of 1.64 release notes)
 - rust-lang#101713 (change AccessLevels representation)
 - rust-lang#101821 (Bump Unicode to version 15.0.0, regenerate tables)
 - rust-lang#101826 (Enforce "joined()" and "joined_with_noop()" test)
 - rust-lang#101835 (Allow using vendoring when running bootstrap from outside the source root)
 - rust-lang#101942 (Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot")
 - rust-lang#101943 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.non-exhaustive { margin-bottom }`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 18, 2022

⌛ Testing commit f0c78ee with merge 5253b0a...

@bors bors merged commit 626c36a into rust-lang:master Sep 18, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.66.0 milestone Sep 18, 2022
@stefson
Copy link

stefson commented Sep 26, 2022

@Mark-Simulacrum the initial fix (which was reverted here) has made it into rust-1.65.0 beta branch, so can you please backport the fix to the beta branch as well?

@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Oct 4, 2022

@rustbot label +beta-nominated +T-release

@rustbot rustbot added beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 4, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Oct 4, 2022
@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Oct 4, 2022
@cuviper cuviper modified the milestones: 1.66.0, 1.65.0 Oct 4, 2022
@cuviper cuviper removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label Oct 4, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
[beta] backports

* Avoid duplicating StorageLive in let-else rust-lang#101894
* Re-add HRTB implied static bug note rust-lang#101924
* Revert "Copy stage0 binaries into stage0-sysroot" rust-lang#101942
* implied_bounds: deal with inference vars rust-lang#102016
* fix ConstProp handling of written_only_inside_own_block_locals rust-lang#102045
* Fix wrongly refactored Lift impl rust-lang#102088
* Fix a typo “pararmeter” in error message rust-lang#102119
* Deny associated type bindings within associated type bindings rust-lang#102338
* Continue migration of CSS themes rust-lang#101934
* Fix search result colors rust-lang#102369
* Fix unwind drop glue for if-then scopes rust-lang#102394
* Revert "Use getentropy when possible on all Apple platforms" rust-lang#102693
* Fix associated type bindings with anon const in GAT position rust-lang#102336
* Revert perf-regression 101620 rust-lang#102064
* `EscapeAscii` is not an `ExactSizeIterator` rust-lang#99880
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-release Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants