Skip to content

stabilise array methods #103522

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2024
Merged

stabilise array methods #103522

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2024

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Closes #76118

Stabilises the remaining array methods

FCP is yet to be carried out for this

There wasn't a clear consensus on the naming, but all the other alternatives had some flaws as discussed in the tracking issue and there was a silence on this issue for a year

@rustbot rustbot added T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 25, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 25, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @joshtriplett

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 25, 2022
@the8472

This comment was marked as off-topic.

# to view
@akoshelev akoshelev mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2022
Open
@Nugine Nugine mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2022
Closed
@smmalis37
Copy link
Contributor

Bump? Would love to see these.

@pitaj
Copy link
Contributor

pitaj commented Jan 28, 2023

@rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs -T-rustdoc

@rustbot rustbot added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. and removed T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 28, 2023
@jyn514 jyn514 added the needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. label Apr 26, 2023
@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt mentioned this pull request Aug 18, 2023
Closed
5 tasks
@pierzchalski
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @joshtriplett @Dylan-DPC, is there anything blocking this going to FCP?

@pierzchalski
Copy link
Contributor

@m-ou-se @Amanieu ?

@dtolnay dtolnay assigned dtolnay and unassigned joshtriplett Sep 17, 2023
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Sep 17, 2023

I made a proposed FCP here: #76118 (comment).

@dtolnay dtolnay added S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 17, 2023
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 15, 2024

Still waiting on other team members to review the FCP.

@dtolnay dtolnay added S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. and removed S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. labels Jan 15, 2024
dtolnay
dtolnay approved these changes Jan 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 26, 2024

@bors r+

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 26, 2024

@bors ping

@dtolnay dtolnay closed this Jan 26, 2024
@dtolnay dtolnay reopened this Jan 26, 2024
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 26, 2024

@bors ping

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 26, 2024

😪 I'm awake I'm awake

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 26, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 26, 2024

📌 Commit 2326f42 has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 26, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Rollup merge of rust-lang#103522 - Dylan-DPC:76118/array-methods-stab…
94723d4 
…, r=dtolnay

stabilise array methods

Closes rust-lang#76118

Stabilises the remaining array methods

FCP is yet to be carried out for this

There wasn't a clear consensus on the naming, but all the other alternatives had some flaws as discussed in the tracking issue and there was a silence on this issue for a year
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2024
Closed
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#120394 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-hq30gxj, r=matth…
fbeb426 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103522 (stabilise array methods)
 - rust-lang#113489 (impl `From<&[T; N]>` for `Cow<[T]>`)
 - rust-lang#119562 (Rename `pointer` field on `Pin`)
 - rust-lang#119800 (Document `rustc_index::vec::IndexVec`)
 - rust-lang#120368 (llvm-wrapper: remove llvm 12 hack)
 - rust-lang#120378 (always normalize `LoweredTy` in the new solver)
 - rust-lang#120382 (Classify closure arguments in refutable pattern in argument error)
 - rust-lang#120389 (Add fmease to the compiler review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2024
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#120401 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-7740vrx, r=matth…
b362939 
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103522 (stabilise array methods)
 - rust-lang#113489 (impl `From<&[T; N]>` for `Cow<[T]>`)
 - rust-lang#119342 (Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as `..<`)
 - rust-lang#119562 (Rename `pointer` field on `Pin`)
 - rust-lang#119800 (Document `rustc_index::vec::IndexVec`)
 - rust-lang#120205 (std: make `HEAP` initializer never inline)
 - rust-lang#120277 (Normalize field types before checking validity)
 - rust-lang#120311 (core: add `From<core::ascii::Char>` implementations)
 - rust-lang#120366 (mark a doctest with UB as no_run)
 - rust-lang#120378 (always normalize `LoweredTy` in the new solver)
 - rust-lang#120382 (Classify closure arguments in refutable pattern in argument error)
 - rust-lang#120389 (Add fmease to the compiler review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c9ab37b into rust-lang:master Jan 27, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 27, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
@rust-timer
Unrolled build for rust-lang#103522
ea29124 
Rollup merge of rust-lang#103522 - Dylan-DPC:76118/array-methods-stab, r=dtolnay

stabilise array methods

Closes rust-lang#76118

Stabilises the remaining array methods

FCP is yet to be carried out for this

There wasn't a clear consensus on the naming, but all the other alternatives had some flaws as discussed in the tracking issue and there was a silence on this issue for a year
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Reviewers

@dtolnay dtolnay dtolnay approved these changes

Assignees

@dtolnay dtolnay

Labels
needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.77.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tracking Issue for array_methods